Fix chained replica crash when doing dual channel replication#2983
Merged
Conversation
There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog:
```
Discarding previously cached primary state.
ASSERTION FAILED
'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true
freeReplicationBacklog
```
The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected.
In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all
replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not
actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in
`freeReplicationBacklog`.
```
void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) {
/* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached
* primary structure. */
serverAssert(server.primary == NULL);
replicationDiscardCachedPrimary();
/* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */
clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync();
disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */
freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */
}
```
Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60.
Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
enjoy-binbin
commented
Dec 26, 2025
Member
Author
|
The crash report: |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## unstable #2983 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 73.79% 73.91% +0.12%
============================================
Files 125 125
Lines 69345 69349 +4
============================================
+ Hits 51173 51260 +87
+ Misses 18172 18089 -83
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
zuiderkwast
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2025
zuiderkwast
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The fix looks safe to me.
Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
naglera
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2025
naglera
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM thanks for the fix!
Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
jdheyburn
pushed a commit
to jdheyburn/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
zuiderkwast
pushed a commit
to zuiderkwast/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
zuiderkwast
pushed a commit
to zuiderkwast/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
zuiderkwast
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog:
```
Discarding previously cached primary state.
ASSERTION FAILED
'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true
freeReplicationBacklog
```
The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected.
In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all
replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not
actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in
`freeReplicationBacklog`.
```
void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) {
/* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached
* primary structure. */
serverAssert(server.primary == NULL);
replicationDiscardCachedPrimary();
/* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */
clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync();
disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */
freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */
}
```
Dual channel replication was introduced in #60.
Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
roshkhatri
pushed a commit
to roshkhatri/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
madolson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2026
There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog:
```
Discarding previously cached primary state.
ASSERTION FAILED
'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true
freeReplicationBacklog
```
The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected.
In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all
replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not
actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in
`freeReplicationBacklog`.
```
void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) {
/* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached
* primary structure. */
serverAssert(server.primary == NULL);
replicationDiscardCachedPrimary();
/* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */
clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync();
disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */
freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */
}
```
Dual channel replication was introduced in #60.
Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
madolson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2026
There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog:
```
Discarding previously cached primary state.
ASSERTION FAILED
'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true
freeReplicationBacklog
```
The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected.
In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all
replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not
actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in
`freeReplicationBacklog`.
```
void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) {
/* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached
* primary structure. */
serverAssert(server.primary == NULL);
replicationDiscardCachedPrimary();
/* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */
clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync();
disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */
freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */
}
```
Dual channel replication was introduced in #60.
Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Roshan Khatri <rvkhatri@amazon.com>
hpatro
pushed a commit
to hpatro/valkey
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2026
…-io#2983) There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog: ``` Discarding previously cached primary state. ASSERTION FAILED 'listLength(server.replicas) == 0' is not true freeReplicationBacklog ``` The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected. In the chained replica case, `disconnectReplicas` is called to disconnect all replica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected, `freeClient` does not actually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in `freeReplicationBacklog`. ``` void replicationAttachToNewPrimary(void) { /* Replica starts to apply data from new primary, we must discard the cached * primary structure. */ serverAssert(server.primary == NULL); replicationDiscardCachedPrimary(); /* Cancel any in progress imports (we will now use the primary's) */ clusterCleanSlotImportsOnFullSync(); disconnectReplicas(); /* Force our replicas to resync with us as well. */ freeReplicationBacklog(); /* Don't allow our chained replicas to PSYNC. */ } ``` Dual channel replication was introduced in valkey-io#60. Signed-off-by: Binbin <binloveplay1314@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Harkrishn Patro <bunty.hari@gmail.com>
lmagomes
pushed a commit
to lmagomes/home-services
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2026
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [docker.io/valkey/valkey](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey) | image | patch | `9.0.1` → `9.0.4` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>valkey-io/valkey (docker.io/valkey/valkey)</summary> ### [`v9.0.4`](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/9.0.4) [Compare Source](valkey-io/valkey@9.0.3...9.0.4) Upgrade urgency SECURITY: This release includes security fixes we recommend you apply as soon as possible. ##### Security fixes - (CVE-2026-23479) Use-After-Free in unblock client flow - (CVE-2026-25243) Invalid Memory Access in RESTORE command - (CVE-2026-23631) Use-after-free when full sync occurs during a yielding Lua/function execution ### [`v9.0.3`](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/9.0.3) [Compare Source](valkey-io/valkey@9.0.2...9.0.3) ##### Valkey 9.0.3 Upgrade urgency SECURITY: This release includes security fixes we recommend you apply as soon as possible. ##### Security fixes - (CVE-2025-67733) RESP Protocol Injection via Lua error\_reply - (CVE-2026-21863) Remote DoS with malformed Valkey Cluster bus message - (CVE-2026-27623) Reset request type after handling empty requests ##### Bug fixes - Avoids crash during MODULE UNLOAD when ACL rules reference a module command and subcommand ([#​3160](valkey-io/valkey#3160)) - Fix server assert on ACL LOAD when current user loses permission to channels ([#​3182](valkey-io/valkey#3182)) - Fix bug causing no response flush sometimes when IO threads are busy ([#​3205](valkey-io/valkey#3205)) ### [`v9.0.2`](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/releases/tag/9.0.2) [Compare Source](valkey-io/valkey@9.0.1...9.0.2) Upgrade urgency HIGH: There are critical bugs that may affect a subset of users. #### Bug fixes - Avoid memory leak of new argv when HEXPIRE commands target only non-exiting fields ([#​2973](valkey-io/valkey#2973)) - Fix HINCRBY and HINCRBYFLOAT to update volatile key tracking ([#​2974](valkey-io/valkey#2974)) - Avoid empty hash object when HSETEX added no fields ([#​2998](valkey-io/valkey#2998)) - Fix case-sensitive check for the FNX and FXX arguments in HSETEX ([#​3000](valkey-io/valkey#3000)) - Prevent assertion in active expiration job after a hash with volatile fields is overwritten ([#​3003](valkey-io/valkey#3003), [#​3007](valkey-io/valkey#3007)) - Fix HRANDFIELD to return null response when no field could be found ([#​3022](valkey-io/valkey#3022)) - Fix HEXPIRE to not delete items when validation rules fail and expiration is in the past ([#​3023](valkey-io/valkey#3023), [#​3048](valkey-io/valkey#3048)) - Fix how hash is handling overriding of expired fields overwrite ([#​3060](valkey-io/valkey#3060)) - HSETEX - Always issue keyspace notifications after validation ([#​3001](valkey-io/valkey#3001)) - Make zero a valid TTL for hash fields during import mode and data loading ([#​3006](valkey-io/valkey#3006)) - Trigger prepareCommand on argc change in module command filters ([#​2945](valkey-io/valkey#2945)) - Restrict TTL from being negative and avoid crash in import-mode ([#​2944](valkey-io/valkey#2944)) - Fix chained replica crash when doing dual channel replication ([#​2983](valkey-io/valkey#2983)) - Skip slot cache optimization for AOF client to prevent key duplication and data corruption ([#​3004](valkey-io/valkey#3004)) - Fix used\_memory\_dataset underflow due to miscalculated used\_memory\_overhead ([#​3005](valkey-io/valkey#3005)) - Avoid duplicate calculations of network-bytes-out in slot stats with copy-avoidance ([#​3046](valkey-io/valkey#3046)) - Fix XREAD returning error on empty stream with + ID ([#​2742](valkey-io/valkey#2742)) #### Performance/Efficiency Improvements - Track reply bytes in I/O threads if commandlog-reply-larger-than is -1 ([#​3086](valkey-io/valkey#3086), [#​3126](valkey-io/valkey#3126)). This makes it possible to mitigate a performance regression in 9.0.1 caused by the bug fix [#​2652](valkey-io/valkey#2652). **Full Changelog**: <valkey-io/valkey@9.0.1...9.0.2> </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: (UTC) - Branch creation - "before 6am" - Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined) 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0My4xNjkuNCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQzLjE2OS40IiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJyZW5vdmF0ZSJdfQ==-->
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is a crash in freeReplicationBacklog:
The reason is that during dual channel operation, the RDB channel is protected.
In the chained replica case,
disconnectReplicasis called to disconnect allreplica clients, but since the RDB channel is protected,
freeClientdoes notactually free the replica client. Later, we encounter an assertion failure in
freeReplicationBacklog.Dual channel replication was introduced in #60.