Revert "core: link user keyring to session keyring (#6275)"#6342
Merged
keszybz merged 1 commit intosystemd:masterfrom Jul 12, 2017
Merged
Revert "core: link user keyring to session keyring (#6275)"#6342keszybz merged 1 commit intosystemd:masterfrom
keszybz merged 1 commit intosystemd:masterfrom
Conversation
This reverts commit 437a851. The outcome of this isn't that clear, let's revert this for now, see discussion on systemd#6286.
Member
|
OK, let's merge this. After all it's a revert, so if it builds is should be no worse then before. |
t184256
added a commit
to t184256/systemd
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 437a851.
The outcome of this isn't that clear, let's revert this for now, see
discussion on #6286.
(We shouldn't change behaviour again until we figured out the right way how to do all this — which is probably with a service option after all)