Skip to content

[fib]: Add FIB test support for t1-64-lag topology#258

Merged
stcheng merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stcheng:fib-64-lag
Sep 29, 2017
Merged

[fib]: Add FIB test support for t1-64-lag topology#258
stcheng merged 1 commit intosonic-net:masterfrom
stcheng:fib-64-lag

Conversation

@stcheng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stcheng stcheng commented Sep 7, 2017

  • the north bound LAG ports are fixed for this topology and are hardcoded

- the north bound LAG ports are fixed for this topology and are hardcoded
@stcheng stcheng requested a review from maggiemsft September 7, 2017 02:20
@stcheng stcheng merged commit 2f6634f into sonic-net:master Sep 29, 2017
@stcheng stcheng deleted the fib-64-lag branch September 29, 2017 20:58
nhe-NV pushed a commit to nhe-NV/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
…or sessions flapping, unisolation, nexthop group member change scenarios (sonic-net#258)

<!--
Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines;
https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

Please provide following information to help code review process a bit easier:
-->
### Description of PR
<!--
- Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
- Please also include relevant motivation and context. Where should reviewer start? background context?
- List any dependencies that are required for this change.
-->

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Implement test plan sonic-net#15702.
Add test cases to test if control/data plane can handle the initialization/flapping of numerous BGP session holding a lot routes, and estimate the impact on it.
### Type of change

<!--
- Fill x for your type of change.
- e.g.
- [x] Bug fix
-->

- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
- [x] Test case(new/improvement)

### Back port request
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202305
- [ ] 202311
- [ ] 202405

### Approach
#### What is the motivation for this PR?
With numerous BGP sessions holding a lot routes, any flapping on BGP sessions or routes cloud have more overhead on device, we need test cases to verify the functionality and estimate convergence time, we publish this test plan.
#### How did you do it?
Implement sessions flapping test, unisolation test and nexthop group member scale test
#### How did you verify/test it?

#### Any platform specific information?

#### Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

### Documentation
<!--
(If it's a new feature, new test case)
Did you update documentation/Wiki relevant to your implementation?
Link to the wiki page?
-->
kazinator-arista pushed a commit to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
Includes below commits

c46de43 2022-05-05 | [201811] Fix: not to use blocking get_all() after keys(), if routestr does not exist, skip (sonic-net#258) [Qi Luo]
kazinator-arista pushed a commit to kazinator-arista/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
sonic-net#20072)

#### Why I did it
src/linkmgrd
```
* d1b5dcc - (HEAD -> 202305, origin/202305) Fix default route race condition UT (sonic-net#258) (sonic-net#273) (12 hours ago) [Longxiang Lyu]
* 7411fb3 - Fix pipeline for 202305 swss common vstest failed. (sonic-net#275) (17 hours ago) [Liu Shilong]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants