Conversation
|
I hope the test failure is unrelated to this PR. |
rth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As a side note, I never really understood/agreed with the issue about assigning labmba functions style wise, and one line functions is not much better IMO (while multiline functions would be somewhat verbose).
Sill LGTM, given that we address linter errors.
The failing check seems to fail because runtime is different, possibly after #16777
Could you re-trigger CI to see it's reproducible (git commit --allow-empty)? In any case we would likely need to fix that check in some other PR.
At least, my editor will show no more linter errors:smirk: |
|
Merging thanks! Just FYI, we generally try to avoid cosmetic changes as it has the potential to create conflicts in PRs #11336 . |
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
This PR fixes some E731 linter warnings.