tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed) #150821
Merged
+0
−33
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup And please close the linked issue |
Contributor
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed) The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See rust-lang#92157 (comment). But that's fine since in the latest compiler says: > note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See rust-lang#92157 (comment). r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in rust-lang#106878
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed) The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See rust-lang#92157 (comment). But that's fine since in the latest compiler says: > note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See rust-lang#92157 (comment). r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in rust-lang#106878
rust-bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #150272 (docs(core): update `find()` and `rfind()` examples) - #150385 (fix `Expr::can_have_side_effects` for `[x; N]` style array literal and binary expressions) - #150561 (Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`) - #150574 (Clarify `MoveData::init_loc_map`.) - #150762 (Use functions more in rustdoc GUI tests) - #150808 (rename the `derive_{eq, clone_copy}` features to `*_internals`) - #150816 (Fix trait method anchor disappearing before user can click on it) - #150821 (tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed)) - #150829 (make attrs actually use `Target::GenericParam`) - #150834 (Add tracking issue for `feature(multiple_supertrait_upcastable)`) - #150864 (The aarch64-unknown-none target requires NEON, so the docs were wrong.) r? @ghost
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
Rollup merge of #150821 - remove-test, r=jackh726 tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed) The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See #92157 (comment). But that's fine since in the latest compiler says: > note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See #92157 (comment). r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in #106878
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2026
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#150272 (docs(core): update `find()` and `rfind()` examples) - rust-lang/rust#150385 (fix `Expr::can_have_side_effects` for `[x; N]` style array literal and binary expressions) - rust-lang/rust#150561 (Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`) - rust-lang/rust#150574 (Clarify `MoveData::init_loc_map`.) - rust-lang/rust#150762 (Use functions more in rustdoc GUI tests) - rust-lang/rust#150808 (rename the `derive_{eq, clone_copy}` features to `*_internals`) - rust-lang/rust#150816 (Fix trait method anchor disappearing before user can click on it) - rust-lang/rust#150821 (tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed)) - rust-lang/rust#150829 (make attrs actually use `Target::GenericParam`) - rust-lang/rust#150834 (Add tracking issue for `feature(multiple_supertrait_upcastable)`) - rust-lang/rust#150864 (The aarch64-unknown-none target requires NEON, so the docs were wrong.) r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong
#[lang = "start"]signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See #92157 (comment).But that's fine since in the latest compiler says:
So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See #92157 (comment).
r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in #106878