Conversation
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use |
rustc dev guide doesn't say anything about it. I'm not away of any extension of ours for how to deal with that. |
| The targets should have unique names. | ||
| Consider changing their names to be unique or compiling them separately. | ||
| This may become a hard error in the future; see <https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/6313>. | ||
| [WARNING] output filename collision at [ROOT]/foo/target/debug/deps/{}a{} |
| [HELP] Check that the patched package version and available features are compatible | ||
| with the dependency requirements. If the patch has a different version from | ||
| what is locked in the Cargo.lock file, run `cargo update` to use the new | ||
| version. This may also occur with an optional dependency that is not enabled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Muscraft thoughts on how this should be a formatted?
47499a9 to
5227b39
Compare
5227b39 to
1cf1c9f
Compare
1cf1c9f to
0755364
Compare
epage
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks!
If others have feedback, we can always iterate it on future commits
|
https://www.dockerstatus.com/pages/incident/533c6539221ae15e3f000031/68f65c32245df0465a50b1e0 Docker hub is down due to an AWS us-east-1 outage. I don't think the retry will get through. |
|
Anyway, let's see. |
Update cargo submodule 7 commits in 367fd9f213750cd40317803dd0a5a3ce3f0c676d..344c4567c634a25837e3c3476aac08af84cf9203 2025-10-15 15:01:32 +0000 to 2025-10-21 21:29:43 +0000 - refactor: Centralize CONTEXT style (rust-lang/cargo#16135) - chore(triagebot): `A-json-output` for machine_message.rs (rust-lang/cargo#16133) - refactor: JSON message with less allocations (rust-lang/cargo#16130) - More warning conversions (rust-lang/cargo#16126) - fix(check): Fix suggested command for bin package (rust-lang/cargo#16127) - fix(script): Remove name sanitiztion outside what is strictly required (rust-lang/cargo#16120) - refactor: Centralize some more styling (rust-lang/cargo#16124) r? ghost
Yet another part of #15944.
I saw some inconsistent formatting for links: some are surrounded in "<>" but others aren't. Is there a policy for that?