subordinate node consistent behavior and update docstring.#2822
subordinate node consistent behavior and update docstring.#2822fujitatomoya merged 3 commits intorollingfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>
|
@jmachowinski @mjcarroll can you review this? |
Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>
|
Pulls: #2822 |
|
We can probably get this into Rolling during the freeze, before Kilted branches off (which it hasn't yet IIUC). |
|
@christophebedard what do you think about backport ? #2822 (comment) |
|
Yeah, I agree, maybe we should hold off on backporting, at least for now. This is the kind of issue that users probably worked around. If someone requests a backport, then we can consider it more seriously. |
|
Warning DO NOT MERGE THIS, WE ARE NOW BRANCHING KILTED. |
|
@Mergifyio backport kilted |
✅ Backports have been createdDetails
|
* subordinate node consistent behavior and update docstring. Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com> * add subnode_parameter_operation test. Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com> * typo fixes. Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com> (cherry picked from commit c89a2b1)
|
Is there a tutorial on how to use this yet? :-D |
|
Not as far as I know, but I opened an issue for that here: ros2/ros2_documentation#5457. |
|
Is there a chance to have this backported to jazzy? Or a workaround for it? |
|
@v-lopez unfortunately i do not think so, as the PR header says this breaks the user space. it looks like we did backport this to kilted, but it is different situation. for kilted, we were just working on the branching from rolling, so that is not counted as backport. |
closes #2795
Note
extend_name_with_sub_namespaceis inline function, so user must rebuild the application with rclcpp to get this fix. besides that, this is behavior change could break the application. i am not inclined to backport this. thoughts?