Skip to content

Conversation

@oranagra
Copy link
Member

@oranagra oranagra commented Jun 18, 2023

When a connection that's subscribe to a channel emits PUBLISH inside MULTI-EXEC, the push notification messes up the EXEC response.

e.g. MULTI, PING, PUSH foo bar, PING, EXEC
the EXEC's response will contain: PONG, {message foo bar}, 1. and the second PONG will be delivered outside the EXEC's response.

Additionally, this PR changes the order of responses in case of a plain PUBLISH (when the current client also subscribed to it), by delivering the push after the command's response instead of before it.
This also affects modules calling RM_PublishMessage in a similar way, so that we don't run the risk of getting that push mixed together with the module command's response.

When a connection that's subscribe to a channel emits PUBLISH inside
MULTI-EXEC, the push notification messes up the EXEC response.

e.g. MULTI, PING, PUSH foo bar, PING, EXEC
the EXEC's response will contain: PONG, {message foo bar}, 1.
and the second PONG will be delivered outside the EXEC's response.
@oranagra oranagra marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2023 13:36
@oranagra oranagra requested a review from yossigo June 18, 2023 13:36
@oranagra
Copy link
Member Author

This fix is somewhat similar to #9422 and #11038, @huangzhw FYI.
while fixing, i added code to make sure i don't accidentally affect other things, such as #12207

…sued it.

This is different than the behavior before this PR, in which for plain
PUBLISH, as well as for a module that called RM_PublishMessage, the
message came before the command's response.

In fact, for a module that issues multiple publish messages, and / or
sends a complex response, the push messages could get mixed with the
command's response, just like they did with MULTI.
@oranagra
Copy link
Member Author

@yossigo please see my second commit (and commit message, that's also now updated in the top comment)

@627721565
Copy link

627721565 commented Jun 18, 2023 via email

@oranagra
Copy link
Member Author

@redis/core-team please approve (see top comment).
the first part (fixing broken EXEC) is undebatable (considering it was simply broken).
but the change about the order of responses in plain PUBLISH (in case you are a subscriber), could be considered a breaking change.

@yossigo
Copy link
Collaborator

yossigo commented Jun 19, 2023

@oranagra Normally, I would lean towards introducing the breaking change only in Redis 8, but I think we can merge it as-is for a few reasons:

  1. The module-related commit is still a bug fix - modules can generate corrupt replies without it.
  2. It is still a minor version, not just a bugfix release.
  3. The breaking change's potential reach is extremely limited - RESP3 clients that use a module to publish a message to themselves.

@oranagra oranagra added state:major-decision Requires core team consensus breaking-change This change can potentially break existing application labels Jun 19, 2023
@oranagra
Copy link
Member Author

approved in a core-team meeting,
despite being similar to #11038, we might not wanna take any risks in destabilizing 6.2.
but we might still consider merging this to 7.0 one day (maybe after it gathers some millage in 7.2)

@oranagra oranagra merged commit 8ad8f0f into redis:unstable Jun 20, 2023
@oranagra oranagra deleted the publish_inside_multi branch June 20, 2023 17:42
@oranagra oranagra added the release-notes indication that this issue needs to be mentioned in the release notes label Jun 20, 2023
@enjoy-binbin
Copy link
Contributor

btw, this may not important, it also affects debug protocol push:
before this commit:

# telnet output
debug protocol push
>2
$16
server-cpu-usage
:42
$40
Some real reply following the push reply

# redis-cli output
127.0.0.1:6379> debug protocol push
1) "server-cpu-usage"
2) (integer) 42
"Some real reply following the push reply"

after this commit (the redis-cli part may need a fix):

# telnet output
debug protocol push
$40
Some real reply following the push reply
>2
$16
server-cpu-usage
:42

# redis-cli output
127.0.0.1:6379> debug protocol push
"Some real reply following the push reply"
127.0.0.1:6379> ping
1) "server-cpu-usage"
2) (integer) 42
PONG
127.0.0.1:6379>

@oranagra oranagra mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2023
oranagra added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
…12817)

Fix #12785 and other race condition issues.
See the following isolated comments.

The following report was obtained using SANITIZER thread.
```sh
make SANITIZER=thread
./runtest-moduleapi --config io-threads 4 --config io-threads-do-reads yes --accurate
```

1. Fixed thread-safe issue in RM_UnblockClient()
Related discussion:
#12817 (comment)
* When blocking a client in a module using `RM_BlockClientOnKeys()` or
`RM_BlockClientOnKeysWithFlags()`
with a timeout_callback, calling RM_UnblockClient() in module threads
can lead to race conditions
     in `updateStatsOnUnblock()`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: #7491

     - Touch:
`server.stat_numcommands`, `cmd->latency_histogram`, `server.slowlog`,
and `server.latency_events`
     
     - Harm Level: High
Potentially corrupts the memory data of `cmd->latency_histogram`,
`server.slowlog`, and `server.latency_events`

     - Solution:
Differentiate whether the call to moduleBlockedClientTimedOut() comes
from the module or the main thread.
Since we can't know if RM_UnblockClient() comes from module threads, we
always assume it does and
let `updateStatsOnUnblock()` asynchronously update the unblock status.
     
* When error reply is called in timeout_callback(), ctx is not
thread-safe, eventually lead to race conditions in `afterErrorReply`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: #8217

     - Touch
       `server.stat_total_error_replies`, `server.errors`, 

     - Harm Level: High
       Potentially corrupts the memory data of `server.errors`
   
      - Solution: 
Make the ctx in `timeout_callback()` with `REDISMODULE_CTX_THREAD_SAFE`,
and asynchronously reply errors to the client.

2. Made RM_Reply*() family API thread-safe
Related discussion:
#12817 (comment)
Call chain: `RM_Reply*()` -> `_addReplyToBufferOrList()` -> touch
server.current_client

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.2.0
       PR: #12326

   - Harm Level: None
Since the module fake client won't have the `CLIENT_PUSHING` flag, even
if we touch server.current_client,
     we can still exit after `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING`.

   - Solution
      Checking `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING` earlier.

3. Made freeClient() thread-safe
    Fix #12785

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
3fcf959

    - Harm Level: Moderate
       * Trigger assertion
It happens when the module thread calls freeClient while the io-thread
is in progress,
which just triggers an assertion, and doesn't make any race condiaions.

* Touch `server.current_client`, `server.stat_clients_type_memory`, and
`clientMemUsageBucket->clients`.
It happens between the main thread and the module threads, may cause
data corruption.
1. Error reset `server.current_client` to NULL, but theoretically this
won't happen,
because the module has already reset `server.current_client` to old
value before entering freeClient.
2. corrupts `clientMemUsageBucket->clients` in
updateClientMemUsageAndBucket().
3. Causes server.stat_clients_type_memory memory statistics to be
inaccurate.
    
    - Solution:
* No longer counts memory usage on fake clients, to avoid updating
`server.stat_clients_type_memory` in freeClient.
* No longer resetting `server.current_client` in unlinkClient, because
the fake client won't be evicted or disconnected in the mid of the
process.
* Judgment assertion `io_threads_op == IO_THREADS_OP_IDLE` only if c is
not a fake client.

4. Fixed free client args without GIL
Related discussion:
#12817 (comment)
When freeing retained strings in the module thread (refcount decr), or
using them in some way (refcount incr), we should do so while holding
the GIL,
otherwise, they might be simultaneously freed while the main thread is
processing the unblock client state.

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2.0
       PR: #8141

   - Harm Level: Low
     Trigger assertion or double free or memory leak. 

   - Solution:
Documenting that module API users need to ensure any access to these
retained strings is done with the GIL locked

5. Fix adding fake client to server.clients_pending_write
    It will incorrectly log the memory usage for the fake client.
Related discussion:
#12817 (comment)

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
9b01b64

    - Harm Level: None
      Only result in NOP

    - Solution:
       * Don't add fake client into server.clients_pending_write
* Add c->conn assertion for updateClientMemUsageAndBucket() and
updateClientMemoryUsage() to avoid same
         issue in the future.
So now it will be the responsibility of the caller of both of them to
avoid passing in fake client.

6. Fix calling RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart() and
RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeEnd() without GIL
    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2
       PR: #7491

   - Harm Level: Low
Causes inaccuracies in command latency histogram and slow logs, but does
not corrupt memory.

   - Solution:
Module API users, if know that non-thread-safe APIs will be used in
multi-threading, need to take responsibility for protecting them with
their own locks instead of the GIL, as using the GIL is too expensive.

### Other issue
1. RM_Yield is not thread-safe, fixed via #12905.

### Summarize
1. Fix thread-safe issues for `RM_UnblockClient()`, `freeClient()` and
`RM_Yield`, potentially preventing memory corruption, data disorder, or
assertion.
2. Updated docs and module test to clarify module API users'
responsibility for locking non-thread-safe APIs in multi-threading, such
as RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart/End(), RM_FreeString(),
RM_RetainString(), and RM_HoldString().

### About backpot to 7.2
1. The implement of (1) is not too satisfying, would like to get more
eyes.
2. (2), (3) can be safely for backport
3. (4), (6) just modifying the module tests and updating the
documentation, no need for a backpot.
4. (5) is harmless, no need for a backpot.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
roggervalf pushed a commit to roggervalf/redis that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2024
…edis#12817)

Fix redis#12785 and other race condition issues.
See the following isolated comments.

The following report was obtained using SANITIZER thread.
```sh
make SANITIZER=thread
./runtest-moduleapi --config io-threads 4 --config io-threads-do-reads yes --accurate
```

1. Fixed thread-safe issue in RM_UnblockClient()
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
* When blocking a client in a module using `RM_BlockClientOnKeys()` or
`RM_BlockClientOnKeysWithFlags()`
with a timeout_callback, calling RM_UnblockClient() in module threads
can lead to race conditions
     in `updateStatsOnUnblock()`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#7491

     - Touch:
`server.stat_numcommands`, `cmd->latency_histogram`, `server.slowlog`,
and `server.latency_events`
     
     - Harm Level: High
Potentially corrupts the memory data of `cmd->latency_histogram`,
`server.slowlog`, and `server.latency_events`

     - Solution:
Differentiate whether the call to moduleBlockedClientTimedOut() comes
from the module or the main thread.
Since we can't know if RM_UnblockClient() comes from module threads, we
always assume it does and
let `updateStatsOnUnblock()` asynchronously update the unblock status.
     
* When error reply is called in timeout_callback(), ctx is not
thread-safe, eventually lead to race conditions in `afterErrorReply`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#8217

     - Touch
       `server.stat_total_error_replies`, `server.errors`, 

     - Harm Level: High
       Potentially corrupts the memory data of `server.errors`
   
      - Solution: 
Make the ctx in `timeout_callback()` with `REDISMODULE_CTX_THREAD_SAFE`,
and asynchronously reply errors to the client.

2. Made RM_Reply*() family API thread-safe
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
Call chain: `RM_Reply*()` -> `_addReplyToBufferOrList()` -> touch
server.current_client

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.2.0
       PR: redis#12326

   - Harm Level: None
Since the module fake client won't have the `CLIENT_PUSHING` flag, even
if we touch server.current_client,
     we can still exit after `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING`.

   - Solution
      Checking `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING` earlier.

3. Made freeClient() thread-safe
    Fix redis#12785

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@3fcf959

    - Harm Level: Moderate
       * Trigger assertion
It happens when the module thread calls freeClient while the io-thread
is in progress,
which just triggers an assertion, and doesn't make any race condiaions.

* Touch `server.current_client`, `server.stat_clients_type_memory`, and
`clientMemUsageBucket->clients`.
It happens between the main thread and the module threads, may cause
data corruption.
1. Error reset `server.current_client` to NULL, but theoretically this
won't happen,
because the module has already reset `server.current_client` to old
value before entering freeClient.
2. corrupts `clientMemUsageBucket->clients` in
updateClientMemUsageAndBucket().
3. Causes server.stat_clients_type_memory memory statistics to be
inaccurate.
    
    - Solution:
* No longer counts memory usage on fake clients, to avoid updating
`server.stat_clients_type_memory` in freeClient.
* No longer resetting `server.current_client` in unlinkClient, because
the fake client won't be evicted or disconnected in the mid of the
process.
* Judgment assertion `io_threads_op == IO_THREADS_OP_IDLE` only if c is
not a fake client.

4. Fixed free client args without GIL
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
When freeing retained strings in the module thread (refcount decr), or
using them in some way (refcount incr), we should do so while holding
the GIL,
otherwise, they might be simultaneously freed while the main thread is
processing the unblock client state.

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2.0
       PR: redis#8141

   - Harm Level: Low
     Trigger assertion or double free or memory leak. 

   - Solution:
Documenting that module API users need to ensure any access to these
retained strings is done with the GIL locked

5. Fix adding fake client to server.clients_pending_write
    It will incorrectly log the memory usage for the fake client.
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@9b01b64

    - Harm Level: None
      Only result in NOP

    - Solution:
       * Don't add fake client into server.clients_pending_write
* Add c->conn assertion for updateClientMemUsageAndBucket() and
updateClientMemoryUsage() to avoid same
         issue in the future.
So now it will be the responsibility of the caller of both of them to
avoid passing in fake client.

6. Fix calling RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart() and
RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeEnd() without GIL
    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2
       PR: redis#7491

   - Harm Level: Low
Causes inaccuracies in command latency histogram and slow logs, but does
not corrupt memory.

   - Solution:
Module API users, if know that non-thread-safe APIs will be used in
multi-threading, need to take responsibility for protecting them with
their own locks instead of the GIL, as using the GIL is too expensive.

### Other issue
1. RM_Yield is not thread-safe, fixed via redis#12905.

### Summarize
1. Fix thread-safe issues for `RM_UnblockClient()`, `freeClient()` and
`RM_Yield`, potentially preventing memory corruption, data disorder, or
assertion.
2. Updated docs and module test to clarify module API users'
responsibility for locking non-thread-safe APIs in multi-threading, such
as RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart/End(), RM_FreeString(),
RM_RetainString(), and RM_HoldString().

### About backpot to 7.2
1. The implement of (1) is not too satisfying, would like to get more
eyes.
2. (2), (3) can be safely for backport
3. (4), (6) just modifying the module tests and updating the
documentation, no need for a backpot.
4. (5) is harmless, no need for a backpot.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
sundb added a commit to sundb/redis that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…edis#12817)

Fix redis#12785 and other race condition issues.
See the following isolated comments.

The following report was obtained using SANITIZER thread.
```sh
make SANITIZER=thread
./runtest-moduleapi --config io-threads 4 --config io-threads-do-reads yes --accurate
```

1. Fixed thread-safe issue in RM_UnblockClient()
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
* When blocking a client in a module using `RM_BlockClientOnKeys()` or
`RM_BlockClientOnKeysWithFlags()`
with a timeout_callback, calling RM_UnblockClient() in module threads
can lead to race conditions
     in `updateStatsOnUnblock()`.

     - Introduced:
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#7491

     - Touch:
`server.stat_numcommands`, `cmd->latency_histogram`, `server.slowlog`,
and `server.latency_events`

     - Harm Level: High
Potentially corrupts the memory data of `cmd->latency_histogram`,
`server.slowlog`, and `server.latency_events`

     - Solution:
Differentiate whether the call to moduleBlockedClientTimedOut() comes
from the module or the main thread.
Since we can't know if RM_UnblockClient() comes from module threads, we
always assume it does and
let `updateStatsOnUnblock()` asynchronously update the unblock status.

* When error reply is called in timeout_callback(), ctx is not
thread-safe, eventually lead to race conditions in `afterErrorReply`.

     - Introduced:
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#8217

     - Touch
       `server.stat_total_error_replies`, `server.errors`,

     - Harm Level: High
       Potentially corrupts the memory data of `server.errors`

      - Solution:
Make the ctx in `timeout_callback()` with `REDISMODULE_CTX_THREAD_SAFE`,
and asynchronously reply errors to the client.

2. Made RM_Reply*() family API thread-safe
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
Call chain: `RM_Reply*()` -> `_addReplyToBufferOrList()` -> touch
server.current_client

    - Introduced:
       Version: 7.2.0
       PR: redis#12326

   - Harm Level: None
Since the module fake client won't have the `CLIENT_PUSHING` flag, even
if we touch server.current_client,
     we can still exit after `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING`.

   - Solution
      Checking `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING` earlier.

3. Made freeClient() thread-safe
    Fix redis#12785

    - Introduced:
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@3fcf959

    - Harm Level: Moderate
       * Trigger assertion
It happens when the module thread calls freeClient while the io-thread
is in progress,
which just triggers an assertion, and doesn't make any race condiaions.

* Touch `server.current_client`, `server.stat_clients_type_memory`, and
`clientMemUsageBucket->clients`.
It happens between the main thread and the module threads, may cause
data corruption.
1. Error reset `server.current_client` to NULL, but theoretically this
won't happen,
because the module has already reset `server.current_client` to old
value before entering freeClient.
2. corrupts `clientMemUsageBucket->clients` in
updateClientMemUsageAndBucket().
3. Causes server.stat_clients_type_memory memory statistics to be
inaccurate.

    - Solution:
* No longer counts memory usage on fake clients, to avoid updating
`server.stat_clients_type_memory` in freeClient.
* No longer resetting `server.current_client` in unlinkClient, because
the fake client won't be evicted or disconnected in the mid of the
process.
* Judgment assertion `io_threads_op == IO_THREADS_OP_IDLE` only if c is
not a fake client.

4. Fixed free client args without GIL
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
When freeing retained strings in the module thread (refcount decr), or
using them in some way (refcount incr), we should do so while holding
the GIL,
otherwise, they might be simultaneously freed while the main thread is
processing the unblock client state.

    - Introduced:
       Version: 6.2.0
       PR: redis#8141

   - Harm Level: Low
     Trigger assertion or double free or memory leak.

   - Solution:
Documenting that module API users need to ensure any access to these
retained strings is done with the GIL locked

5. Fix adding fake client to server.clients_pending_write
    It will incorrectly log the memory usage for the fake client.
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)

    - Introduced:
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@9b01b64

    - Harm Level: None
      Only result in NOP

    - Solution:
       * Don't add fake client into server.clients_pending_write
* Add c->conn assertion for updateClientMemUsageAndBucket() and
updateClientMemoryUsage() to avoid same
         issue in the future.
So now it will be the responsibility of the caller of both of them to
avoid passing in fake client.

6. Fix calling RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart() and
RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeEnd() without GIL
    - Introduced:
       Version: 6.2
       PR: redis#7491

   - Harm Level: Low
Causes inaccuracies in command latency histogram and slow logs, but does
not corrupt memory.

   - Solution:
Module API users, if know that non-thread-safe APIs will be used in
multi-threading, need to take responsibility for protecting them with
their own locks instead of the GIL, as using the GIL is too expensive.

1. RM_Yield is not thread-safe, fixed via redis#12905.

1. Fix thread-safe issues for `RM_UnblockClient()`, `freeClient()` and
`RM_Yield`, potentially preventing memory corruption, data disorder, or
assertion.
2. Updated docs and module test to clarify module API users'
responsibility for locking non-thread-safe APIs in multi-threading, such
as RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart/End(), RM_FreeString(),
RM_RetainString(), and RM_HoldString().

1. The implement of (1) is not too satisfying, would like to get more
eyes.
2. (2), (3) can be safely for backport
3. (4), (6) just modifying the module tests and updating the
documentation, no need for a backpot.
4. (5) is harmless, no need for a backpot.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
YaacovHazan pushed a commit to YaacovHazan/redis that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
…edis#12817)

Fix redis#12785 and other race condition issues.
See the following isolated comments.

The following report was obtained using SANITIZER thread.
```sh
make SANITIZER=thread
./runtest-moduleapi --config io-threads 4 --config io-threads-do-reads yes --accurate
```

1. Fixed thread-safe issue in RM_UnblockClient()
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
* When blocking a client in a module using `RM_BlockClientOnKeys()` or
`RM_BlockClientOnKeysWithFlags()`
with a timeout_callback, calling RM_UnblockClient() in module threads
can lead to race conditions
     in `updateStatsOnUnblock()`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#7491

     - Touch:
`server.stat_numcommands`, `cmd->latency_histogram`, `server.slowlog`,
and `server.latency_events`
     
     - Harm Level: High
Potentially corrupts the memory data of `cmd->latency_histogram`,
`server.slowlog`, and `server.latency_events`

     - Solution:
Differentiate whether the call to moduleBlockedClientTimedOut() comes
from the module or the main thread.
Since we can't know if RM_UnblockClient() comes from module threads, we
always assume it does and
let `updateStatsOnUnblock()` asynchronously update the unblock status.
     
* When error reply is called in timeout_callback(), ctx is not
thread-safe, eventually lead to race conditions in `afterErrorReply`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#8217

     - Touch
       `server.stat_total_error_replies`, `server.errors`, 

     - Harm Level: High
       Potentially corrupts the memory data of `server.errors`
   
      - Solution: 
Make the ctx in `timeout_callback()` with `REDISMODULE_CTX_THREAD_SAFE`,
and asynchronously reply errors to the client.

2. Made RM_Reply*() family API thread-safe
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
Call chain: `RM_Reply*()` -> `_addReplyToBufferOrList()` -> touch
server.current_client

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.2.0
       PR: redis#12326

   - Harm Level: None
Since the module fake client won't have the `CLIENT_PUSHING` flag, even
if we touch server.current_client,
     we can still exit after `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING`.

   - Solution
      Checking `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING` earlier.

3. Made freeClient() thread-safe
    Fix redis#12785

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@3fcf959

    - Harm Level: Moderate
       * Trigger assertion
It happens when the module thread calls freeClient while the io-thread
is in progress,
which just triggers an assertion, and doesn't make any race condiaions.

* Touch `server.current_client`, `server.stat_clients_type_memory`, and
`clientMemUsageBucket->clients`.
It happens between the main thread and the module threads, may cause
data corruption.
1. Error reset `server.current_client` to NULL, but theoretically this
won't happen,
because the module has already reset `server.current_client` to old
value before entering freeClient.
2. corrupts `clientMemUsageBucket->clients` in
updateClientMemUsageAndBucket().
3. Causes server.stat_clients_type_memory memory statistics to be
inaccurate.
    
    - Solution:
* No longer counts memory usage on fake clients, to avoid updating
`server.stat_clients_type_memory` in freeClient.
* No longer resetting `server.current_client` in unlinkClient, because
the fake client won't be evicted or disconnected in the mid of the
process.
* Judgment assertion `io_threads_op == IO_THREADS_OP_IDLE` only if c is
not a fake client.

4. Fixed free client args without GIL
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
When freeing retained strings in the module thread (refcount decr), or
using them in some way (refcount incr), we should do so while holding
the GIL,
otherwise, they might be simultaneously freed while the main thread is
processing the unblock client state.

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2.0
       PR: redis#8141

   - Harm Level: Low
     Trigger assertion or double free or memory leak. 

   - Solution:
Documenting that module API users need to ensure any access to these
retained strings is done with the GIL locked

5. Fix adding fake client to server.clients_pending_write
    It will incorrectly log the memory usage for the fake client.
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@9b01b64

    - Harm Level: None
      Only result in NOP

    - Solution:
       * Don't add fake client into server.clients_pending_write
* Add c->conn assertion for updateClientMemUsageAndBucket() and
updateClientMemoryUsage() to avoid same
         issue in the future.
So now it will be the responsibility of the caller of both of them to
avoid passing in fake client.

6. Fix calling RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart() and
RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeEnd() without GIL
    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2
       PR: redis#7491

   - Harm Level: Low
Causes inaccuracies in command latency histogram and slow logs, but does
not corrupt memory.

   - Solution:
Module API users, if know that non-thread-safe APIs will be used in
multi-threading, need to take responsibility for protecting them with
their own locks instead of the GIL, as using the GIL is too expensive.

### Other issue
1. RM_Yield is not thread-safe, fixed via redis#12905.

### Summarize
1. Fix thread-safe issues for `RM_UnblockClient()`, `freeClient()` and
`RM_Yield`, potentially preventing memory corruption, data disorder, or
assertion.
2. Updated docs and module test to clarify module API users'
responsibility for locking non-thread-safe APIs in multi-threading, such
as RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart/End(), RM_FreeString(),
RM_RetainString(), and RM_HoldString().

### About backpot to 7.2
1. The implement of (1) is not too satisfying, would like to get more
eyes.
2. (2), (3) can be safely for backport
3. (4), (6) just modifying the module tests and updating the
documentation, no need for a backpot.
4. (5) is harmless, no need for a backpot.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
funny-dog pushed a commit to funny-dog/redis that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
…edis#12817)

Fix redis#12785 and other race condition issues.
See the following isolated comments.

The following report was obtained using SANITIZER thread.
```sh
make SANITIZER=thread
./runtest-moduleapi --config io-threads 4 --config io-threads-do-reads yes --accurate
```

1. Fixed thread-safe issue in RM_UnblockClient()
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
* When blocking a client in a module using `RM_BlockClientOnKeys()` or
`RM_BlockClientOnKeysWithFlags()`
with a timeout_callback, calling RM_UnblockClient() in module threads
can lead to race conditions
     in `updateStatsOnUnblock()`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#7491

     - Touch:
`server.stat_numcommands`, `cmd->latency_histogram`, `server.slowlog`,
and `server.latency_events`
     
     - Harm Level: High
Potentially corrupts the memory data of `cmd->latency_histogram`,
`server.slowlog`, and `server.latency_events`

     - Solution:
Differentiate whether the call to moduleBlockedClientTimedOut() comes
from the module or the main thread.
Since we can't know if RM_UnblockClient() comes from module threads, we
always assume it does and
let `updateStatsOnUnblock()` asynchronously update the unblock status.
     
* When error reply is called in timeout_callback(), ctx is not
thread-safe, eventually lead to race conditions in `afterErrorReply`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: redis#8217

     - Touch
       `server.stat_total_error_replies`, `server.errors`, 

     - Harm Level: High
       Potentially corrupts the memory data of `server.errors`
   
      - Solution: 
Make the ctx in `timeout_callback()` with `REDISMODULE_CTX_THREAD_SAFE`,
and asynchronously reply errors to the client.

2. Made RM_Reply*() family API thread-safe
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
Call chain: `RM_Reply*()` -> `_addReplyToBufferOrList()` -> touch
server.current_client

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.2.0
       PR: redis#12326

   - Harm Level: None
Since the module fake client won't have the `CLIENT_PUSHING` flag, even
if we touch server.current_client,
     we can still exit after `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING`.

   - Solution
      Checking `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING` earlier.

3. Made freeClient() thread-safe
    Fix redis#12785

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@fa1b900

    - Harm Level: Moderate
       * Trigger assertion
It happens when the module thread calls freeClient while the io-thread
is in progress,
which just triggers an assertion, and doesn't make any race condiaions.

* Touch `server.current_client`, `server.stat_clients_type_memory`, and
`clientMemUsageBucket->clients`.
It happens between the main thread and the module threads, may cause
data corruption.
1. Error reset `server.current_client` to NULL, but theoretically this
won't happen,
because the module has already reset `server.current_client` to old
value before entering freeClient.
2. corrupts `clientMemUsageBucket->clients` in
updateClientMemUsageAndBucket().
3. Causes server.stat_clients_type_memory memory statistics to be
inaccurate.
    
    - Solution:
* No longer counts memory usage on fake clients, to avoid updating
`server.stat_clients_type_memory` in freeClient.
* No longer resetting `server.current_client` in unlinkClient, because
the fake client won't be evicted or disconnected in the mid of the
process.
* Judgment assertion `io_threads_op == IO_THREADS_OP_IDLE` only if c is
not a fake client.

4. Fixed free client args without GIL
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)
When freeing retained strings in the module thread (refcount decr), or
using them in some way (refcount incr), we should do so while holding
the GIL,
otherwise, they might be simultaneously freed while the main thread is
processing the unblock client state.

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2.0
       PR: redis#8141

   - Harm Level: Low
     Trigger assertion or double free or memory leak. 

   - Solution:
Documenting that module API users need to ensure any access to these
retained strings is done with the GIL locked

5. Fix adding fake client to server.clients_pending_write
    It will incorrectly log the memory usage for the fake client.
Related discussion:
redis#12817 (comment)

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
redis@e96bac5

    - Harm Level: None
      Only result in NOP

    - Solution:
       * Don't add fake client into server.clients_pending_write
* Add c->conn assertion for updateClientMemUsageAndBucket() and
updateClientMemoryUsage() to avoid same
         issue in the future.
So now it will be the responsibility of the caller of both of them to
avoid passing in fake client.

6. Fix calling RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart() and
RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeEnd() without GIL
    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2
       PR: redis#7491

   - Harm Level: Low
Causes inaccuracies in command latency histogram and slow logs, but does
not corrupt memory.

   - Solution:
Module API users, if know that non-thread-safe APIs will be used in
multi-threading, need to take responsibility for protecting them with
their own locks instead of the GIL, as using the GIL is too expensive.

### Other issue
1. RM_Yield is not thread-safe, fixed via redis#12905.

### Summarize
1. Fix thread-safe issues for `RM_UnblockClient()`, `freeClient()` and
`RM_Yield`, potentially preventing memory corruption, data disorder, or
assertion.
2. Updated docs and module test to clarify module API users'
responsibility for locking non-thread-safe APIs in multi-threading, such
as RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart/End(), RM_FreeString(),
RM_RetainString(), and RM_HoldString().

### About backpot to 7.2
1. The implement of (1) is not too satisfying, would like to get more
eyes.
2. (2), (3) can be safely for backport
3. (4), (6) just modifying the module tests and updating the
documentation, no need for a backpot.
4. (5) is harmless, no need for a backpot.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking-change This change can potentially break existing application release-notes indication that this issue needs to be mentioned in the release notes state:major-decision Requires core team consensus

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants