[vision hash update] update the pinned vision hash by pytorchmergebot · Pull Request #82560 · pytorch/pytorch

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-01T07:42:32Z

This PR is auto-generated nightly by this action.
Update the pinned vision hash.

pytorchbot · 2022-08-01T07:42:33Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

facebook-github-bot · 2022-08-01T07:42:38Z

🔗 Helpful links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/82560
📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR
📄 Preview C++ docs built from this PR
❓Need help or want to give feedback on the CI? Visit our office hours

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

As of commit c762c9f (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-01T07:45:40Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-01T09:36:09Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2773116357

pytorchbot · 2022-08-02T07:41:32Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-02T07:44:21Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-02T08:24:32Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2780439451

pytorchbot · 2022-08-03T07:41:08Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-03T07:43:44Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-03T08:28:56Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2787723303

pytorchbot · 2022-08-04T07:41:20Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-04T07:44:15Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-04T08:24:27Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2794991048

pytorchbot · 2022-08-05T07:41:09Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-05T07:44:22Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-05T08:24:34Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2802065271

pytorchbot · 2022-08-06T07:41:26Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-06T07:43:42Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-06T08:33:55Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2808146243

pytorchbot · 2022-08-07T07:40:53Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-09T08:29:52Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2823579233

pytorchbot · 2022-08-10T07:42:07Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-10T07:46:30Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-10T08:26:41Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2830910646

Summary: Resolves [breakages](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/7762125339?check_suite_focus=true) observed at #82560 Context: The current FX tests assume that every public method under `torchvision.models` is a model builder method. To get a list of those methods, they query the `__dict__` attribute of the module. Unfortunately this assumption is not true and the tests already contain some workarounds to filter some methods. A better approach would be to query TorchVision for all of its available models under a specific module. This is exactly what the new Registration API can help us do and that's what we use in this PR. Pull Request resolved: #83187 Test Plan: buck1 test mode/dev //caffe2/test:fx Reviewed By: ezyang Differential Revision: D38583882 Pulled By: datumbox fbshipit-source-id: a2b98596928f95fba7e4f34d047e0602f0a6c1f9

Resolves [breakages](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/7762125339?check_suite_focus=true) observed at #82560 Context: The current FX tests assume that every public method under `torchvision.models` is a model builder method. To get a list of those methods, they query the `__dict__` attribute of the module. Unfortunately this assumption is not true and the tests already contain some workarounds to filter some methods. A better approach would be to query TorchVision for all of its available models under a specific module. This is exactly what the new Registration API can help us do and that's what we use in this PR. Pull Request resolved: #83187 Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang

Summary: Resolves [breakages](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/7762125339?check_suite_focus=true) observed at #82560 Context: The current FX tests assume that every public method under `torchvision.models` is a model builder method. To get a list of those methods, they query the `__dict__` attribute of the module. Unfortunately this assumption is not true and the tests already contain some workarounds to filter some methods. A better approach would be to query TorchVision for all of its available models under a specific module. This is exactly what the new Registration API can help us do and that's what we use in this PR. Pull Request resolved: #83187 Test Plan: buck1 test mode/dev //caffe2/test:fx Reviewed By: ezyang Differential Revision: D38583882 Pulled By: datumbox fbshipit-source-id: 65ac636afc9898ca6edaddfd085db69ec40fd34d

pytorchbot · 2022-08-11T07:41:33Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-11T07:44:12Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-11T08:34:26Z

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule CI Pinned Hashes
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2838184916

Summary: Addresses some [breakages](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/7782559841?check_suite_focus=true) from #82560 Pull Request resolved: #83242 Differential Revision: D38614693 Pulled By: datumbox fbshipit-source-id: 882eea1b6c57d48d7d5b9efe7437fccf7f1e34d8

Addresses some [breakages](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/7782559841?check_suite_focus=true) from #82560 Context: The tests are breaking because a new architecture was added in TorchVision (see pytorch/vision#6373) that requires a different input size. This PR addresses it by using the right size for the `mvit_v2_s` architecture. Pull Request resolved: #83242 Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang

Summary: Addresses some [breakages](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/7782559841?check_suite_focus=true) from #82560 Pull Request resolved: #83242 Reviewed By: ezyang Differential Revision: D38614693 Pulled By: datumbox fbshipit-source-id: 4096b935b0bf90cc921e231c3554e144b66d7515

pytorchbot · 2022-08-12T07:41:14Z

@pytorchbot merge -g

pytorchmergebot · 2022-08-12T07:44:13Z

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here.
The merge job was triggered with the green (-g) flag. This means that your change will be merged once all checks on your PR have passed (ETA: 0-4 Hours). If this is not the intended behavior, feel free to use some of the other merge options in the wiki.
Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team with feedback or questions!

github-actions · 2022-08-12T10:25:27Z

Hey @pytorchmergebot.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

Summary: This PR is auto-generated nightly by [this action](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/master/.github/workflows/_update-commit-hash.yml). Update the pinned vision hash. Pull Request resolved: #82560 Approved by: https://github.com/pytorchbot Test Plan: contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/d5fb4e2a2769f712077cb51b34dec21ea56f6d71 Reviewed By: atalman Differential Revision: D38658633 Pulled By: atalman fbshipit-source-id: e61d94e3f9209a99d57928b81370815d405211b3

pytorchmergebot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2022 07:42

pytorchbot approved these changes Aug 1, 2022

View reviewed changes

facebook-github-bot added the cla signed label Aug 1, 2022

pytorchbot added the open source label Aug 1, 2022

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from 026f0aa to 5047036 Compare August 2, 2022 07:41

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from 5047036 to b57b5d6 Compare August 3, 2022 07:41

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from b57b5d6 to 83453a6 Compare August 4, 2022 07:41

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from 83453a6 to 92b9599 Compare August 5, 2022 07:41

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from 92b9599 to 7dc5986 Compare August 6, 2022 07:41

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from 7dc5986 to dc4fdd5 Compare August 7, 2022 07:40

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from 006e4c4 to 9244988 Compare August 10, 2022 07:42

datumbox mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2022

Fix broken FX tests #83187

Closed

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from 9244988 to aadeda2 Compare August 11, 2022 07:41

datumbox mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2022

Change the input of mvit_v2_s on the FX test #83242

Closed

update vision commit hash

c762c9f

pytorchmergebot force-pushed the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch from aadeda2 to c762c9f Compare August 12, 2022 07:41

pytorchmergebot added the Merged label Aug 12, 2022

pytorchmergebot closed this in d5fb4e2 Aug 12, 2022

github-actions bot deleted the update-vision-commit-hash/2773110797-56-1 branch February 19, 2024 01:54

Conversation

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 1, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 1, 2022

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Aug 1, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 1, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 1, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 2, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 2, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 2, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 3, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 3, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 3, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 4, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 4, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 4, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 5, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 5, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 5, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 6, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 6, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 6, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 7, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 9, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 10, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 10, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 10, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 11, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 11, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 11, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchbot commented Aug 12, 2022

Uh oh!

pytorchmergebot commented Aug 12, 2022

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Aug 12, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

facebook-github-bot commented Aug 1, 2022 •

edited

Loading