Skip to content

[do not merge] Catch all Flake8 warnings#52755

Closed
samestep wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
samestep:catch-all-flake8-warnings
Closed

[do not merge] Catch all Flake8 warnings#52755
samestep wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
samestep:catch-all-flake8-warnings

Conversation

@samestep
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Testing part of #52750.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Feb 24, 2021

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit eb21ff7 (more details on the Dr. CI page):



1 failure not recognized by patterns:

Job Step Action
GitHub Actions flake8-py3 Catch any other warnings 🔁 rerun

❄️ 1 failure tentatively classified as flaky

but reruns have not yet been triggered to confirm:

See GitHub Actions build clang-tidy (1/1)

Step: "Checkout PyTorch" (full log | diagnosis details | 🔁 rerun) ❄️

2021-02-24T17:38:30.5769869Z ##[error]fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/pull/52755/merge
2021-02-24T17:38:25.7541218Z ##[command]git remote add origin https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch
2021-02-24T17:38:25.7648156Z ##[command]git config gc.auto 0
2021-02-24T17:38:25.7772336Z ##[command]git config --get-all http.https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch.extraheader
2021-02-24T17:38:25.7860742Z ##[command]git -c http.extraheader="AUTHORIZATION: basic ***" fetch --tags --prune --progress --no-recurse-submodules origin +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* +refs/pull/52755/merge:refs/remotes/pull/52755/merge
2021-02-24T17:38:26.3414817Z ##[error]fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/pull/52755/merge
2021-02-24T17:38:26.3505321Z ##[warning]Git fetch failed with exit code 128, back off 1.959 seconds before retry.
2021-02-24T17:38:28.3067449Z ##[command]git -c http.extraheader="AUTHORIZATION: basic ***" fetch --tags --prune --progress --no-recurse-submodules origin +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* +refs/pull/52755/merge:refs/remotes/pull/52755/merge
2021-02-24T17:38:28.6082203Z ##[error]fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/pull/52755/merge
2021-02-24T17:38:28.6156059Z ##[warning]Git fetch failed with exit code 128, back off 1.626 seconds before retry.
2021-02-24T17:38:30.2439552Z ##[command]git -c http.extraheader="AUTHORIZATION: basic ***" fetch --tags --prune --progress --no-recurse-submodules origin +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* +refs/pull/52755/merge:refs/remotes/pull/52755/merge
2021-02-24T17:38:30.5769869Z ##[error]fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/pull/52755/merge
2021-02-24T17:38:30.5841105Z ##[error]Git fetch failed with exit code: 128
2021-02-24T17:38:30.6145536Z ##[error]Exit code 1 returned from process: file name '/home/runner/runners/2.277.1/bin/Runner.PluginHost', arguments 'action "GitHub.Runner.Plugins.Repository.v1_0.CheckoutTask, Runner.Plugins"'.
2021-02-24T17:38:30.6249511Z Cleaning up orphan processes


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

@samestep samestep reopened this Feb 24, 2021
@samestep samestep closed this Feb 24, 2021
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2021
Summary:
The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future.

Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings:

- #50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma
  - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py`
- #51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py`
- #51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py`
- #51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py`
- #51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py`
- #51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py`

Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang?

Pull Request resolved: #52750

Test Plan:
The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions:

- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in #52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix

Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99

Differential Revision: D26637307

Pulled By: samestep

fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
walterddr pushed a commit to walterddr/pytorch that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2021
Summary:
The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future.

Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings:

- pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma
  - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py`
- pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py`
- pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py`
- pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py`
- pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py`
- pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py`

Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang?

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750

Test Plan:
The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions:

- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix

Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99

Differential Revision: D26637307

Pulled By: samestep

fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
malfet pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2021
Summary:
The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future.

Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings:

- #50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma
  - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py`
- #51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py`
- #51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py`
- #51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py`
- #51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py`
- #51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py`

Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang?

Pull Request resolved: #52750

Test Plan:
The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions:

- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in #52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix

Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99

Differential Revision: D26637307

Pulled By: samestep

fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804

Co-authored-by: Sam Estep <sestep@fb.com>
aocsa pushed a commit to Quansight/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
Summary:
The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future.

Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings:

- pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma
  - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py`
- pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py`
- pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py`
- pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py`
- pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py`
- pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py`

Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang?

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750

Test Plan:
The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions:

- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix

Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99

Differential Revision: D26637307

Pulled By: samestep

fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
xsacha pushed a commit to xsacha/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2021
Summary:
The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future.

Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings:

- pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma
  - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py`
- pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py`
- pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py`
- pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py`
- pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py`
- pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py`

Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang?

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750

Test Plan:
The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions:

- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix

Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99

Differential Revision: D26637307

Pulled By: samestep

fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
laurentdupin pushed a commit to laurentdupin/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
Summary:
The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future.

Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings:

- pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma
  - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py`
- pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py`
- pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py`
- pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py`
- pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py`
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py`
- pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan
  - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py`

Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang?

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750

Test Plan:
The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions:

- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings
- [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix

Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99

Differential Revision: D26637307

Pulled By: samestep

fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants