move ZipDataset to Zip DataPipe#51599
Closed
glaringlee wants to merge 2 commits intogh/glaringlee/42/basefrom
Closed
move ZipDataset to Zip DataPipe#51599glaringlee wants to merge 2 commits intogh/glaringlee/42/basefrom
glaringlee wants to merge 2 commits intogh/glaringlee/42/basefrom
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
Contributor
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 322ed64 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
This is to update ZipDataset into Zip DataPipe Differential Revision: [D26212859](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26212859) [ghstack-poisoned]
Contributor
|
@glaringlee merged this pull request in 1ee0c42. |
facebook-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2021
Summary: The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future. Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings: - #50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py` - #51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py` - #51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py` - #51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py` - #51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py` - #51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py` Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang? Pull Request resolved: #52750 Test Plan: The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions: - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in #52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99 Differential Revision: D26637307 Pulled By: samestep fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
walterddr
pushed a commit
to walterddr/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2021
Summary: The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future. Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings: - pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py` - pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py` - pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py` - pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py` - pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py` - pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py` Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang? Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750 Test Plan: The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions: - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99 Differential Revision: D26637307 Pulled By: samestep fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
malfet
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2021
Summary: The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future. Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings: - #50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py` - #51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py` - #51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py` - #51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py` - #51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py` - #51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py` Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang? Pull Request resolved: #52750 Test Plan: The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions: - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in #52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99 Differential Revision: D26637307 Pulled By: samestep fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804 Co-authored-by: Sam Estep <sestep@fb.com>
aocsa
pushed a commit
to Quansight/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
Summary: The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future. Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings: - pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py` - pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py` - pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py` - pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py` - pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py` - pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py` Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang? Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750 Test Plan: The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions: - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99 Differential Revision: D26637307 Pulled By: samestep fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
xsacha
pushed a commit
to xsacha/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2021
Summary: The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future. Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings: - pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py` - pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py` - pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py` - pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py` - pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py` - pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py` Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang? Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750 Test Plan: The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions: - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99 Differential Revision: D26637307 Pulled By: samestep fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
laurentdupin
pushed a commit
to laurentdupin/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#51599 Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: ejguan Differential Revision: D26212859 Pulled By: glaringlee fbshipit-source-id: 3fabcf8876d3c9c24339dbf6a12e0bb04b400108
laurentdupin
pushed a commit
to laurentdupin/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
Summary: The Flake8 job has been passing on `master` despite giving warnings for [over a month](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1716124347). This is because it has been using a regex that doesn't recognize error codes starting with multiple letters, such as those used by [flake8-executable](https://pypi.org/project/flake8-executable/). This PR corrects the regex, and also adds another step at the end of the job which asserts that Flake8 actually gave no error output, in case similar regex issues appear in the future. Tagging the following people to ask what to do to fix these `EXE002` warnings: - pytorch#50629 authored by jaglinux, approved by rohan-varma - `test/distributed/test_c10d.py` - pytorch#51262 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/loadfilesfromdisk.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/listdirfiles.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/__init__.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/common.py` - pytorch#51398 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromtar.py` - pytorch#51599 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/readfilesfromzip.py` - pytorch#51704 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/routeddecoder.py` - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/utils/decoder.py` - pytorch#51709 authored by glaringlee, approved by ejguan - `torch/utils/data/datapipes/iter/groupbykey.py` Specifically, the question is: for each of those files, should we remove the execute permissions, or should we add a shebang? And if the latter, which shebang? Pull Request resolved: pytorch#52750 Test Plan: The **Lint / flake8-py3** job in GitHub Actions: - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972039886) failed, showing that the new regex catches these warnings properly - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/runs/1972393293) succeeded and gave no output in the "Run flake8" step, showing that this PR fixed all Flake8 warnings - [this run](https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/52755/checks?check_run_id=1972414849) (in pytorch#52755) failed, showing that the new last step of the job successfully catches Flake8 warnings even without the regex fix Reviewed By: walterddr, janeyx99 Differential Revision: D26637307 Pulled By: samestep fbshipit-source-id: 572af6a3bbe57f5e9bd47f19f37c39db90f7b804
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack:
This is to update ZipDataset into Zip DataPipe
Differential Revision: D26212859