Skip to content

Remove intrusive_ptr::reclaim() in Storage (2/2)#11547

Closed
smessmer wants to merge 6 commits intoexport-D9694327from
export-D9778042
Closed

Remove intrusive_ptr::reclaim() in Storage (2/2)#11547
smessmer wants to merge 6 commits intoexport-D9694327from
export-D9778042

Conversation

@smessmer
Copy link
Contributor

@smessmer smessmer commented Sep 11, 2018

Stack:
    :white_circle:  #11352 Remove intrusive_ptr::reclaim() in Storage  💛
    :black_circle:  #11547 Remove intrusive_ptr::reclaim() in Storage (2/2)  💚
    :white_circle:  #11353 Simplify union payload copying  💛
    :white_circle:  #11355 Simplify IValue::toTensor()  💛
    :white_circle:  #11402 Simplify Blob move constructor/assignment  💛
    :white_circle:  #11414 IValue can store Blob  💛
    :white_circle:  #11548 Blob doesn't allow access to destroyCall anymore  💛
    :white_circle:  #11500 Use TypeMeta::dtor() instead of Blob::DestroyCall  💛
    :white_circle:  #11501 Move GetExceptionString to Error.h  💛
    :white_circle:  #11502 Improve TypeMeta  💛

Pushing manual refcounting further back, making things safer.

Differential Revision: D9778042

Differential Revision: D9778042
Differential Version: 57535402
Differential Revision: D9778042
Differential Version: 57551485
Differential Revision: D9778042
Differential Version: 57670064
Differential Revision: D9778042
Differential Version: 57695963
Differential Revision: D9778042
Differential Version: 57757838
Differential Revision: D9778042
Differential Version: 57851524
zdevito pushed a commit to zdevito/ATen that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2018
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#11547

Pushing manual refcounting further back, making things safer.

Reviewed By: ezyang

Differential Revision: D9778042

fbshipit-source-id: c9572edc440c5ce5ea1b2355b5c54f87078ea28e
@soumith soumith deleted the export-D9778042 branch February 21, 2019 12:10
@ezyang ezyang added the merged label Jun 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants