raft: Fix the max concurrency of IngestSST#10609
Merged
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intopingcap:masterfrom Dec 11, 2025
Merged
raft: Fix the max concurrency of IngestSST#10609ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
Conversation
…y-pool-size Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <tshent@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <tshent@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <tshent@qq.com>
CalvinNeo
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2025
Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <tshent@qq.com>
12 tasks
JinheLin
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2025
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: CalvinNeo, JinheLin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Contributor
Member
|
In response to a cherrypick label: failed to apply #10609 on top of branch "release-8.5": |
Contributor
Author
|
/cherry-pick release-nextgen-20251011 |
Member
|
@JaySon-Huang: new pull request created to branch DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
12 tasks
ti-chi-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2025
close #10605 * Parse `raftstore.apply-low-priority-pool-size` in `KVStore::fetchProxyConfig` * `KVStore::getMaxPrehandleSubtaskSize` return different max concurrency according to the job_type Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <tshent@qq.com> Co-authored-by: JaySon-Huang <tshent@qq.com>
wshwsh12
pushed a commit
to wshwsh12/tiflash
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
close pingcap#10605 * Parse `raftstore.apply-low-priority-pool-size` in `KVStore::fetchProxyConfig` * `KVStore::getMaxPrehandleSubtaskSize` return different max concurrency according to the job_type Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <tshent@qq.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #10605
Problem Summary: as the issue comment describe #10605 (comment)
KVStore::preHandleSSTsToDTFilesis the common path for both PreHandleSnapshot and IngestSST, callingprehandling_trace.waitForSubtaskResourceswill block the max concurrency of IngestSST by the pre handle snapshot thread-poolWhat is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
confirm that tiflash can successful parse and get the ingest sst max concurrency from tiflash-proxy
Run BR restore chbenchmark-1500
Side effects
Documentation
Release note