Skip to content

refactor(formatter/sort_imports): Extract closure to flush line#22205

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
05-07-refactor_formatter_sort_imports_extract_closure_to_flush_line
May 7, 2026
Merged

refactor(formatter/sort_imports): Extract closure to flush line#22205
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
05-07-refactor_formatter_sort_imports_extract_closure_to_flush_line

Conversation

@leaysgur

@leaysgur leaysgur commented May 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@leaysgur leaysgur requested a review from Dunqing as a code owner May 7, 2026 04:23
@leaysgur Graphite App

leaysgur commented May 7, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent changes, fast-track this PR to the front of the merge queue

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the A-formatter Area - Formatter label May 7, 2026
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 44 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 7 skipped benchmarks1

Comparing 05-07-refactor_formatter_sort_imports_extract_closure_to_flush_line (251ff64) with main (7bb00dd)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 7 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. No successful run was found on 05-07-perf_formatter_sort_imports_skip_sort_for_single_import_runs (1a728a0) during the generation of this report, so main (7bb00dd) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@leaysgur leaysgur added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label May 7, 2026
@leaysgur Graphite App

leaysgur commented May 7, 2026 •
edited by graphite-app Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app Bot force-pushed the 05-07-perf_formatter_sort_imports_skip_sort_for_single_import_runs branch from 1a728a0 to f14e81e Compare May 7, 2026 04:36
@graphite-app graphite-app Bot force-pushed the 05-07-refactor_formatter_sort_imports_extract_closure_to_flush_line branch from 251ff64 to 2766124 Compare May 7, 2026 04:36
@graphite-app graphite-app Bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label May 7, 2026
Base automatically changed from 05-07-perf_formatter_sort_imports_skip_sort_for_single_import_runs to main May 7, 2026 04:41
@graphite-app graphite-app Bot merged commit 2766124 into main May 7, 2026
30 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app Bot deleted the 05-07-refactor_formatter_sort_imports_extract_closure_to_flush_line branch May 7, 2026 04:42
This was referenced May 7, 2026
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Dunqing Dunqing Awaiting requested review from Dunqing Dunqing is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

A-formatter Area - Formatter

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@leaysgur