Skip to content

8252715: Problem list java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyTyped/CtrlASCII.java on Linux#23

Closed
prrace wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
prrace:8252715
Closed

8252715: Problem list java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyTyped/CtrlASCII.java on Linux#23
prrace wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
prrace:8252715

Conversation

@prrace
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@prrace prrace commented Sep 5, 2020

Bug :https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252715

We've opened a bug to track some xserver issues running this test that cause all subsequent tests to fail
because they can't connect even though the server is still running.
Possibly it is a system configuration issue or perhaps an Xserver bug,
but it has been seen on more than one Ubuntu system running 19.10 and 20.04 and
I think we should problem list it to see if that cures/hides it .. or moves it .. as this happens
so frequently we can't wait for an investigation to complete.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8252715: Problem list java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyTyped/CtrlASCII.java on Linux

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/23/head:pull/23
$ git checkout pull/23

@bridgekeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bridgekeeper Bot commented Sep 5, 2020

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 5, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Sep 5, 2020

@prrace To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an RFR email automatically sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more labels manually using the /label add "label" command. The following labels are valid: 2d, awt, beans, build, compiler, core-libs, hotspot, hotspot-compiler, hotspot-gc, hotspot-jfr, hotspot-runtime, i18n, javadoc, jdk, jmx, kulla, net, nio, security, serviceability, shenandoah, sound, swing.

@prrace
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

prrace commented Sep 5, 2020

/label add awt

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the awt client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 5, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Sep 5, 2020

@prrace
The awt label was successfully added.

@mlbridge
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mlbridge Bot commented Sep 5, 2020

Webrevs

Comment thread test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
java/awt/event/KeyEvent/ExtendedModifiersTest/ExtendedModifiersTest.java 8129778 generic-all
java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyMaskTest/KeyMaskTest.java 8129778 generic-all
java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyTyped/CtrlASCII.java 8252713 linux-all
java/awt/event/MouseEvent/MouseButtonsAndKeyMasksTest/MouseButtonsAndKeyMasksTest.java 8129778 generic-all
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test inline comment: Looks fine.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mrserb mrserb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Sep 5, 2020

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. When the change also fulfills all project specific requirements, type /integrate in a new comment to proceed. After integration, the commit message will be:

8252715: Problem list java/awt/event/KeyEvent/KeyTyped/CtrlASCII.java on Linux

Reviewed-by: serb
  • If you would like to add a summary, use the /summary command.
  • To credit additional contributors, use the /contributor command.
  • To add additional solved issues, use the /issue command.

There are currently no new commits on the master branch since the last update of the source branch of this PR. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you would like to avoid potential automatic rebasing, specify the current head hash when integrating, like this: /integrate 4b3a0b789ebf389a9589c9af2d3922fb91916d92.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 5, 2020
@prrace
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

prrace commented Sep 5, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk Bot closed this Sep 5, 2020
@openjdk openjdk Bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 5, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Sep 5, 2020

@prrace Pushed as commit d0f4366. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@prrace prrace deleted the 8252715 branch September 8, 2020 16:49
caojoshua pushed a commit to caojoshua/jdk that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
Co-authored-by: Xin Liu <xxinliu@amazon.com>
robehn pushed a commit to robehn/jdk that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
openjdk-notifier Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
* Even more review comments

* Re-write of atomic copy loops

* Change name of UnsafeCopyMemory{,Mark} to UnsafeMemory{Access,Mark}

* Only add a memory mark for byte unaligned fill

* Remove MUSL_LIBC ifdef

* Remove MUSL_LIBC ifdef
biboudis added a commit to biboudis/jdk that referenced this pull request May 8, 2025
…penjdk#23)

* Instance patterns represented by instance methods in the translation

* Second Approach: rely on the mangled name
mo-beck added a commit to mo-beck/jdk that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2026
- Add assert for _analytics in constructor instead of runtime null check
- Remove unnecessary null check for _analytics before use
- Remove unnecessary region_size > 0 check (region size can never be 0)
- Remove unused total_regions variable
- Move Ticks::now() outside loop for better performance

Addresses issues openjdk#17, openjdk#20, openjdk#22, openjdk#23 from Thomas review
mo-beck added a commit to mo-beck/jdk that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2026
- Add assert for _analytics in constructor instead of runtime null check
- Remove unnecessary null check for _analytics before use
- Remove unnecessary region_size > 0 check (region size can never be 0)
- Remove unused total_regions variable
- Move Ticks::now() outside loop for better performance

Addresses issues openjdk#17, openjdk#20, openjdk#22, openjdk#23 from Thomas review
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awt client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants