Skip to content

G-API: Introduce some classic CV ops via OV backend#24379

Closed
dmatveev wants to merge 1 commit intoopencv:4.xfrom
dmatveev:dm/ovcv
Closed

G-API: Introduce some classic CV ops via OV backend#24379
dmatveev wants to merge 1 commit intoopencv:4.xfrom
dmatveev:dm/ovcv

Conversation

@dmatveev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
  • The PR is proposed to the proper branch
  • There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
  • There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
    Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
  • The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake

asmorkalov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
G-API: A quick value-initialization support GMat #25055

This PR enables `GMat` objects to be value-initialized in the same way as it was done for `GScalar`s (and, possibly, other types).

- Added some helper methods in backends to distinguish if a certain G-type value initialization is supported or not;
- Added tests, including negative.

Where it is needed:

- Further extension of the OVCV backend (#24379 - will be refreshed soon);
- Further experiments with DNN module;
- Further experiments with "G-API behind UMat" sort of aggregation.

In the current form, PR can be reviewed & merged (@TolyaTalamanov please have a look)

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
klatism pushed a commit to klatism/opencv that referenced this pull request May 17, 2024
G-API: A quick value-initialization support GMat opencv#25055

This PR enables `GMat` objects to be value-initialized in the same way as it was done for `GScalar`s (and, possibly, other types).

- Added some helper methods in backends to distinguish if a certain G-type value initialization is supported or not;
- Added tests, including negative.

Where it is needed:

- Further extension of the OVCV backend (opencv#24379 - will be refreshed soon);
- Further experiments with DNN module;
- Further experiments with "G-API behind UMat" sort of aggregation.

In the current form, PR can be reviewed & merged (@TolyaTalamanov please have a look)

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
@asmorkalov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dmatveev @TolyaTalamanov Is the PR still relevant?

@asmorkalov asmorkalov closed this Sep 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants