Add support for the VisioBraille Vario 4 Braille Device#12607
Conversation
|
@ the first commit the VID wasn´t correcht 0904 is right...the Alias VisioBraille should be used is that possible? @michaelDCurran |
See test results for failed build of commit 2d86e96cae |
|
Do you think you might fill out the pull request template?
|
|
I've converted this to a draft, let us know when the template has been filled out and this is ready for review. |
|
On first inspection this looks like a duplicate of #12606, however the "VID" (vender ID) is different The only information given at the top of #12606 is:
Since these two PR's are so similar, I'm going to close #12606. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've updated the title and the PR description.
You can test that this works using the build link you have added to the Pull Request description.
This pull request is currently targeting master, likely to be included in the 2021.3 release, if you wish this to be included in 2021.2 please test this and update the target branch for this request to beta.
the Alias VisioBraille should be used is that possible?
Is this something that is also blocking the request from being merged?
Co-authored-by: Sean Budd <seanbudd123@gmail.com>
|
Hello Sean, is there any possibility to include the Vario 4 device support into Update 2021.2 instead of 2021.3? |
|
Hello Sean, What do I have to do for the integration of the Vario464 and the Vario480? Many thanks in advance for helping me. |
|
@seanbudd |
|
Hi Dirk, |
|
Thanks for responding. I sent a mail for you to info@nvaccess.org. Will you respond it? |
Link to issue number:
None
Summary of the issue:
Set new PID for the Vario 4 series
Description of how this pull request fixes the issue:
want to build 3 length of the Vario 4 20 40 80 because the device tell the screenreader the length while connection
we need only need one new PID
Testing strategy:
Manual testing
Build (for testing PR): https://ci.appveyor.com/api/buildjobs/0djn47pgvabr30ut/artifacts/output/nvda_snapshot_pr12607-23270,2d86e96c.exe
Known issues with pull request:
None
Change log entries:
New features
Code Review Checklist: