Skip to content

Policy native contract unit test#764

Merged
shargon merged 1 commit intoneo-project:3.0/policyfrom
shargon:ut-policy2
May 20, 2019
Merged

Policy native contract unit test#764
shargon merged 1 commit intoneo-project:3.0/policyfrom
shargon:ut-policy2

Conversation

@shargon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@shargon shargon commented May 20, 2019

No description provided.

@shargon shargon requested a review from erikzhang May 20, 2019 11:15
@shargon shargon changed the title Policy native Contract unit test Policy native contract unit test May 20, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented May 20, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #764 into 3.0/policy will increase coverage by 0.71%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           3.0/policy     #764      +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage       32.34%   33.06%   +0.71%     
==============================================
  Files             164      164              
  Lines           11845    11845              
==============================================
+ Hits             3831     3916      +85     
+ Misses           8014     7929      -85
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
neo/VM/Helper.cs 9.03% <0%> (+5.16%) ⬆️
neo/Network/P2P/TaskManager.cs 16.75% <0%> (+5.58%) ⬆️
neo/SmartContract/ContractParameter.cs 6.25% <0%> (+5.62%) ⬆️
neo/IO/Actors/PriorityMailbox.cs 87.5% <0%> (+12.5%) ⬆️
neo/IO/Actors/PriorityMessageQueue.cs 86.2% <0%> (+24.13%) ⬆️
neo/SmartContract/Native/PolicyContract.cs 100% <0%> (+50.5%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update acbba89...f22dd7f. Read the comment docs.

@shargon shargon merged commit fba093f into neo-project:3.0/policy May 20, 2019
@shargon shargon deleted the ut-policy2 branch May 20, 2019 11:22
Thacryba pushed a commit to simplitech/neo that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants