Skip to content

Rename script attribute#762

Merged
shargon merged 1 commit intoneo-project:masterfrom
shargon:rename-script
May 20, 2019
Merged

Rename script attribute#762
shargon merged 1 commit intoneo-project:masterfrom
shargon:rename-script

Conversation

@shargon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@shargon shargon commented May 20, 2019

No description provided.

@shargon shargon requested a review from erikzhang May 20, 2019 07:51
@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #762 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 20%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #762   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   32.31%   32.31%           
=======================================
  Files         163      163           
  Lines       11736    11736           
=======================================
  Hits         3793     3793           
  Misses       7943     7943
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
neo/Network/P2P/Payloads/TransactionAttribute.cs 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
neo/Wallets/Wallet.cs 5.95% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
neo/Network/P2P/Payloads/Transaction.cs 66.94% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 67d2b88...c23c6c2. Read the comment docs.

@erikzhang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

erikzhang commented May 20, 2019

Why does Codecov always send two reports?

@shargon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

shargon commented May 20, 2019

Why does Codecov always send two reports?

I don't know ...

@shargon shargon merged commit aa84466 into neo-project:master May 20, 2019
@shargon shargon deleted the rename-script branch May 20, 2019 08:19
Thacryba pushed a commit to simplitech/neo that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants