Skip to content

MNT: Avoid non-parametrized testing inside parametrized test#6532

Merged
massich merged 6 commits intomne-tools:masterfrom
massich:eeglab_tst
Jul 5, 2019
Merged

MNT: Avoid non-parametrized testing inside parametrized test#6532
massich merged 6 commits intomne-tools:masterfrom
massich:eeglab_tst

Conversation

@massich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@massich massich commented Jul 5, 2019

We run some non-parametrized code several times just because the code
is inside a parametrized test

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jul 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6532 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6532      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.31%   89.31%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         413      413              
  Lines       74562    74549      -13     
  Branches    12296    12294       -2     
==========================================
- Hits        66592    66581      -11     
+ Misses       5128     5127       -1     
+ Partials     2842     2841       -1

@massich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

massich commented Jul 5, 2019

That's all I would touch in here. Otherwise, #6526 would diverge too much. Hopefully, this should be green and no coverage lost.

cc: @agramfort

@massich massich marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2019 15:14
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@agramfort agramfort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand fully what you're doing but merge as soon as it's green

@massich massich merged commit 0bb360b into mne-tools:master Jul 5, 2019
@massich massich deleted the eeglab_tst branch August 7, 2019 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants