Ledger9 with no migration#1604
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 36decc6087
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 78219b6fe3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2a8f6bbab7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d7476dabe0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 28e2ecf97c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5a73c339b6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
dde1d4b to
f8616de
Compare
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Bartos <tomasz.bartos@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
f8616de to
b69aabd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b69aabd027
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
3e85876 to
6f667fb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6f667fb3fa
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
ozgb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, nice work!
Some comments to ensure follow-up work doesn't get lost
|
Let's bump the toolkit version to 2.0.0 too |
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
3103020 to
895755a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
Signed-off-by: Lech Głowiak <lech.glowiak@shielded.io>
With #1629 (per-runner host-port isolation) reverted, re-apply our approach on the clean base: - action.yml: run the whole premerge surface via earthly -P +local-env-ci (stack -> finality -> e2e -> toolkit) inside nested dockerd; keeps #1631's docker/login-action v4.2.0 bump. - continuous-integration.yml: drop the local-environment-tests-self-hosted concurrency group (netns isolation removes host-port collisions). Preserves #1631 (login-action) and #1604 (Ledger9 toolkit-js step comments). Net vs main: the two approaches to shielded-sre#281 are mutually exclusive; this branch chooses nested-dockerd netns isolation over per-runner port blocks. Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
The GitHub-UI merge of main into this branch brought in ledger_9.rs (PR #1604) without declaring `pub mod output_spec;`, leaving single_tx and batch_single_tx unable to resolve `super::output_spec` when compiled under the ledger_9 variant. Matches what ledger_7 and ledger_8 already do. Fixes the +check-rust and +check-feature-unification CI failures on PR #1560. Assisted-by: Claude:claude-4.7-opus Signed-off-by: chrispalaskas <chris.palaskas@gmail.com>
Overview
Add Ledger9 alpha.1 support.
At this point it allows new chain to start in the local-environment.
🗹 TODO before merging
📌 Submission Checklist
git commit -s) for the DCO🧪 Testing Evidence
Please describe any additional testing aside from CI:
🔱 Fork Strategy
Links
#1579