[Merged by Bors] - refactor: add explicit equation lemmas for comp and flip#8371
Closed
eric-wieser wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - refactor: add explicit equation lemmas for comp and flip#8371eric-wieser wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
comp and flip#8371eric-wieser wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
This will mostly be a no-op in the current version of Lean, but will override the new behavior in the next version.
Contributor
|
Thanks! bors r+ |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2023
This will mostly be a no-op in the current version of Lean, but will override the new behavior from leanprover/lean4#2783. Once consequence of this is that `rw [comp]` no longer uses "smart unfolding"; it introduces a non-beta reduced term if the composition was applied. As a result, these places need to use `rw [comp_apply]` instead. My claim is that this is no big deal. This is split from the lean bump PR #8023, targeting master, to make clear what the fallout is.
kim-em
reviewed
Nov 12, 2023
Comment on lines
+29
to
+34
| attribute [eqns comp_def] comp | ||
|
|
||
| lemma flip_def {f : α → β → φ} : flip f = fun b a => f a b := rfl | ||
|
|
||
| attribute [eqns flip_def] flip | ||
|
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am extremely hesitant to make this change in Mathlib; if we want to change a basic behaviour like this shouldn't we coordinate with Std and Lean? I worry that it introduces a confusing variation in behaviour across the ecosystem.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For other readers, discussion continues on Zulip; the conclusion is that we can live with this in the short term, but should indeed upstream or coordinate.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Undoability was one of the reasons I decided to go ahead and merge. I was seeing it as a workaround to help get the version bump done sooner rather than a permanent design.
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
comp and flipcomp and flip
eric-wieser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2023
These should no longer be needed after the change in #8371
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2023
# PR contents This is the supremum of - #8284 - #8056 - #8023 - #8332 - #8226 (already approved) - #7834 (already approved) along with some minor fixes from failures on nightly-testing as Mathlib `master` is merged into it. Note that some PRs for changes that are already compatible with the current toolchain and will be necessary have already been split out: #8380. I am hopeful that in future we will be able to progressively merge adaptation PRs into a `bump/v4.X.0` branch, so we never end up with a "big merge" like this. However one of these adaptation PRs (#8056) predates my new scheme for combined CI, and it wasn't possible to keep that PR viable in the meantime. # Lean PRs involved in this bump In particular this includes adjustments for the Lean PRs * leanprover/lean4#2778 * leanprover/lean4#2790 * leanprover/lean4#2783 * leanprover/lean4#2825 * leanprover/lean4#2722 ## leanprover/lean4#2778 We can get rid of all the ``` local macro_rules | `($x ^ $y) => `(HPow.hPow $x $y) -- Porting note: See issue lean4#2220 ``` macros across Mathlib (and in any projects that want to write natural number powers of reals). ## leanprover/lean4#2722 Changes the default behaviour of `simp` to `(config := {decide := false})`. This makes `simp` (and consequentially `norm_num`) less powerful, but also more consistent, and less likely to blow up in long failures. This requires a variety of changes: changing some previously by `simp` or `norm_num` to `decide` or `rfl`, or adding `(config := {decide := true})`. ## leanprover/lean4#2783 This changed the behaviour of `simp` so that `simp [f]` will only unfold "fully applied" occurrences of `f`. The old behaviour can be recovered with `simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })`. We may in future add a syntax for this, e.g. `simp [!f]`; please provide feedback! In the meantime, we have made the following changes: * switching to using explicit lemmas that have the intended level of application * `(config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })` in some places, to recover the old behaviour * Using `@[eqns]` to manually adjust the equation lemmas for a particular definition, recovering the old behaviour just for that definition. See #8371, where we do this for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`. This change in Lean may require further changes down the line (e.g. adding the `!f` syntax, and/or upstreaming the special treatment for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`, and/or removing this special treatment). Please keep an open and skeptical mind about these changes! Co-authored-by: leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot <leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mauricio Collares <mauricio@collares.org>
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2023
# PR contents This is the supremum of - #8284 - #8056 - #8023 - #8332 - #8226 (already approved) - #7834 (already approved) along with some minor fixes from failures on nightly-testing as Mathlib `master` is merged into it. Note that some PRs for changes that are already compatible with the current toolchain and will be necessary have already been split out: #8380. I am hopeful that in future we will be able to progressively merge adaptation PRs into a `bump/v4.X.0` branch, so we never end up with a "big merge" like this. However one of these adaptation PRs (#8056) predates my new scheme for combined CI, and it wasn't possible to keep that PR viable in the meantime. # Lean PRs involved in this bump In particular this includes adjustments for the Lean PRs * leanprover/lean4#2778 * leanprover/lean4#2790 * leanprover/lean4#2783 * leanprover/lean4#2825 * leanprover/lean4#2722 ## leanprover/lean4#2778 We can get rid of all the ``` local macro_rules | `($x ^ $y) => `(HPow.hPow $x $y) -- Porting note: See issue lean4#2220 ``` macros across Mathlib (and in any projects that want to write natural number powers of reals). ## leanprover/lean4#2722 Changes the default behaviour of `simp` to `(config := {decide := false})`. This makes `simp` (and consequentially `norm_num`) less powerful, but also more consistent, and less likely to blow up in long failures. This requires a variety of changes: changing some previously by `simp` or `norm_num` to `decide` or `rfl`, or adding `(config := {decide := true})`. ## leanprover/lean4#2783 This changed the behaviour of `simp` so that `simp [f]` will only unfold "fully applied" occurrences of `f`. The old behaviour can be recovered with `simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })`. We may in future add a syntax for this, e.g. `simp [!f]`; please provide feedback! In the meantime, we have made the following changes: * switching to using explicit lemmas that have the intended level of application * `(config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })` in some places, to recover the old behaviour * Using `@[eqns]` to manually adjust the equation lemmas for a particular definition, recovering the old behaviour just for that definition. See #8371, where we do this for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`. This change in Lean may require further changes down the line (e.g. adding the `!f` syntax, and/or upstreaming the special treatment for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`, and/or removing this special treatment). Please keep an open and skeptical mind about these changes! Co-authored-by: leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot <leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mauricio Collares <mauricio@collares.org>
alexkeizer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2023
This will mostly be a no-op in the current version of Lean, but will override the new behavior from leanprover/lean4#2783. Once consequence of this is that `rw [comp]` no longer uses "smart unfolding"; it introduces a non-beta reduced term if the composition was applied. As a result, these places need to use `rw [comp_apply]` instead. My claim is that this is no big deal. This is split from the lean bump PR #8023, targeting master, to make clear what the fallout is.
alexkeizer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2023
# PR contents This is the supremum of - #8284 - #8056 - #8023 - #8332 - #8226 (already approved) - #7834 (already approved) along with some minor fixes from failures on nightly-testing as Mathlib `master` is merged into it. Note that some PRs for changes that are already compatible with the current toolchain and will be necessary have already been split out: #8380. I am hopeful that in future we will be able to progressively merge adaptation PRs into a `bump/v4.X.0` branch, so we never end up with a "big merge" like this. However one of these adaptation PRs (#8056) predates my new scheme for combined CI, and it wasn't possible to keep that PR viable in the meantime. # Lean PRs involved in this bump In particular this includes adjustments for the Lean PRs * leanprover/lean4#2778 * leanprover/lean4#2790 * leanprover/lean4#2783 * leanprover/lean4#2825 * leanprover/lean4#2722 ## leanprover/lean4#2778 We can get rid of all the ``` local macro_rules | `($x ^ $y) => `(HPow.hPow $x $y) -- Porting note: See issue lean4#2220 ``` macros across Mathlib (and in any projects that want to write natural number powers of reals). ## leanprover/lean4#2722 Changes the default behaviour of `simp` to `(config := {decide := false})`. This makes `simp` (and consequentially `norm_num`) less powerful, but also more consistent, and less likely to blow up in long failures. This requires a variety of changes: changing some previously by `simp` or `norm_num` to `decide` or `rfl`, or adding `(config := {decide := true})`. ## leanprover/lean4#2783 This changed the behaviour of `simp` so that `simp [f]` will only unfold "fully applied" occurrences of `f`. The old behaviour can be recovered with `simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })`. We may in future add a syntax for this, e.g. `simp [!f]`; please provide feedback! In the meantime, we have made the following changes: * switching to using explicit lemmas that have the intended level of application * `(config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })` in some places, to recover the old behaviour * Using `@[eqns]` to manually adjust the equation lemmas for a particular definition, recovering the old behaviour just for that definition. See #8371, where we do this for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`. This change in Lean may require further changes down the line (e.g. adding the `!f` syntax, and/or upstreaming the special treatment for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`, and/or removing this special treatment). Please keep an open and skeptical mind about these changes! Co-authored-by: leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot <leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mauricio Collares <mauricio@collares.org>
alexkeizer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2023
This will mostly be a no-op in the current version of Lean, but will override the new behavior from leanprover/lean4#2783. Once consequence of this is that `rw [comp]` no longer uses "smart unfolding"; it introduces a non-beta reduced term if the composition was applied. As a result, these places need to use `rw [comp_apply]` instead. My claim is that this is no big deal. This is split from the lean bump PR #8023, targeting master, to make clear what the fallout is.
alexkeizer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2023
This is the supremum of - #8284 - #8056 - #8023 - #8332 - #8226 (already approved) - #7834 (already approved) along with some minor fixes from failures on nightly-testing as Mathlib `master` is merged into it. Note that some PRs for changes that are already compatible with the current toolchain and will be necessary have already been split out: #8380. I am hopeful that in future we will be able to progressively merge adaptation PRs into a `bump/v4.X.0` branch, so we never end up with a "big merge" like this. However one of these adaptation PRs (#8056) predates my new scheme for combined CI, and it wasn't possible to keep that PR viable in the meantime. In particular this includes adjustments for the Lean PRs * leanprover/lean4#2778 * leanprover/lean4#2790 * leanprover/lean4#2783 * leanprover/lean4#2825 * leanprover/lean4#2722 We can get rid of all the ``` local macro_rules | `($x ^ $y) => `(HPow.hPow $x $y) -- Porting note: See issue lean4#2220 ``` macros across Mathlib (and in any projects that want to write natural number powers of reals). Changes the default behaviour of `simp` to `(config := {decide := false})`. This makes `simp` (and consequentially `norm_num`) less powerful, but also more consistent, and less likely to blow up in long failures. This requires a variety of changes: changing some previously by `simp` or `norm_num` to `decide` or `rfl`, or adding `(config := {decide := true})`. This changed the behaviour of `simp` so that `simp [f]` will only unfold "fully applied" occurrences of `f`. The old behaviour can be recovered with `simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })`. We may in future add a syntax for this, e.g. `simp [!f]`; please provide feedback! In the meantime, we have made the following changes: * switching to using explicit lemmas that have the intended level of application * `(config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })` in some places, to recover the old behaviour * Using `@[eqns]` to manually adjust the equation lemmas for a particular definition, recovering the old behaviour just for that definition. See #8371, where we do this for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`. This change in Lean may require further changes down the line (e.g. adding the `!f` syntax, and/or upstreaming the special treatment for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`, and/or removing this special treatment). Please keep an open and skeptical mind about these changes! Co-authored-by: leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot <leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mauricio Collares <mauricio@collares.org>
grunweg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
This will mostly be a no-op in the current version of Lean, but will override the new behavior from leanprover/lean4#2783. Once consequence of this is that `rw [comp]` no longer uses "smart unfolding"; it introduces a non-beta reduced term if the composition was applied. As a result, these places need to use `rw [comp_apply]` instead. My claim is that this is no big deal. This is split from the lean bump PR #8023, targeting master, to make clear what the fallout is.
grunweg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2023
# PR contents This is the supremum of - #8284 - #8056 - #8023 - #8332 - #8226 (already approved) - #7834 (already approved) along with some minor fixes from failures on nightly-testing as Mathlib `master` is merged into it. Note that some PRs for changes that are already compatible with the current toolchain and will be necessary have already been split out: #8380. I am hopeful that in future we will be able to progressively merge adaptation PRs into a `bump/v4.X.0` branch, so we never end up with a "big merge" like this. However one of these adaptation PRs (#8056) predates my new scheme for combined CI, and it wasn't possible to keep that PR viable in the meantime. # Lean PRs involved in this bump In particular this includes adjustments for the Lean PRs * leanprover/lean4#2778 * leanprover/lean4#2790 * leanprover/lean4#2783 * leanprover/lean4#2825 * leanprover/lean4#2722 ## leanprover/lean4#2778 We can get rid of all the ``` local macro_rules | `($x ^ $y) => `(HPow.hPow $x $y) -- Porting note: See issue lean4#2220 ``` macros across Mathlib (and in any projects that want to write natural number powers of reals). ## leanprover/lean4#2722 Changes the default behaviour of `simp` to `(config := {decide := false})`. This makes `simp` (and consequentially `norm_num`) less powerful, but also more consistent, and less likely to blow up in long failures. This requires a variety of changes: changing some previously by `simp` or `norm_num` to `decide` or `rfl`, or adding `(config := {decide := true})`. ## leanprover/lean4#2783 This changed the behaviour of `simp` so that `simp [f]` will only unfold "fully applied" occurrences of `f`. The old behaviour can be recovered with `simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })`. We may in future add a syntax for this, e.g. `simp [!f]`; please provide feedback! In the meantime, we have made the following changes: * switching to using explicit lemmas that have the intended level of application * `(config := { unfoldPartialApp := true })` in some places, to recover the old behaviour * Using `@[eqns]` to manually adjust the equation lemmas for a particular definition, recovering the old behaviour just for that definition. See #8371, where we do this for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`. This change in Lean may require further changes down the line (e.g. adding the `!f` syntax, and/or upstreaming the special treatment for `Function.comp` and `Function.flip`, and/or removing this special treatment). Please keep an open and skeptical mind about these changes! Co-authored-by: leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot <leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mauricio Collares <mauricio@collares.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will mostly be a no-op in the current version of Lean, but will override the new behavior from leanprover/lean4#2783.
Once consequence of this is that
rw [comp]no longer uses "smart unfolding"; it introduces a non-beta reduced term if the composition was applied. As a result, these places need to userw [comp_apply]instead.My claim is that this is no big deal.
This is split from the lean bump PR #8023, targeting master, to make clear what the fallout is.
The conflicts in #8366 will be trivial to fix, and I am happy to do so; assuming we want this.
If we don't like the look of these regressions, and would prefer to write
comp_defeverywhere, then we should revert the last few commits on #8023.