Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - feat: analogue of iSup.prod for sets#7528

Closed
grunweg wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
MR_iUnion_newprod
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - feat: analogue of iSup.prod for sets#7528
grunweg wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
MR_iUnion_newprod

Conversation

@grunweg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@grunweg grunweg commented Oct 5, 2023


As suggested on Zulip.

Feedback on the lemma name is appreciated; iUnion_prod is already taken by a different lemma.

@grunweg grunweg force-pushed the MR_iUnion_newprod branch from 599e4c7 to d41c960 Compare October 5, 2023 16:56

/-- Analogue of `iSup.prod` for sets. -/
lemma Set.iUnion_prod' {X Y Z : Type*} (f : X × Y → Set Z) :
⋃ (x : X) (y : Y), (f ⟨x, y⟩) = ⋃ t : X × Y, (f t) := by
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you put the statement in the same order as iSup_prod? Ideally the proof would be precisely iSup_prod.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@grunweg grunweg Oct 5, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reversed the statement (and renamed all variables to exactly match iSup_prod. The proof becomes one line longer, though.

@grunweg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

grunweg commented Oct 8, 2023

(Guessing a topic in the sense of mathlib.)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ADedecker ADedecker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

bors d+

@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Oct 8, 2023

✌️ grunweg can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@ghost ghost added delegated This pull request has been delegated to the PR author (or occasionally another non-maintainer). and removed awaiting-review labels Oct 8, 2023
Co-authored-by: Anatole Dedecker.
@grunweg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

grunweg commented Oct 8, 2023

Thank you for the fast review.

@grunweg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

grunweg commented Oct 8, 2023

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2023
Co-authored-by: grunweg <grunweg@posteo.de>
@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bors bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title feat: analogue of iSup.prod for sets [Merged by Bors] - feat: analogue of iSup.prod for sets Oct 9, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Oct 9, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the MR_iUnion_newprod branch October 9, 2023 00:50
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
Define sigma-compact subsets of a topological space and show their basic properties.

* compact sets are sigma-compact
* countable unions of (sigma-)compact sets are sigma-compact
* closed subsets of sigma-compact sets are sigma-compact.

Relate them to sigma-compact space: a set is sigma-compact iff it is a sigma-compact space (w.r.t. the subspace topology).

In a later PR, we'll show that sigma-compact measure zero sets are nowhere dense.

- [x] depends on: #7528


Co-authored-by: David Loeffler <d.loeffler.01@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: grunweg <grunweg@posteo.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

delegated This pull request has been delegated to the PR author (or occasionally another non-maintainer). t-order Order theory

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants