Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - refactor: weaken HasPullbacks to HasPullback in MorphismProperty.Limits#29812

Closed
Jlh18 wants to merge 16 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Jlh18:MorphismPropertyLimits
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - refactor: weaken HasPullbacks to HasPullback in MorphismProperty.Limits#29812
Jlh18 wants to merge 16 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Jlh18:MorphismPropertyLimits

Conversation

@Jlh18
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Jlh18 Jlh18 commented Sep 19, 2025

The HasPullbacks instance on a category C for defining the baseChange / pullback functor along a map f : X -> Y between their over categories can be weakened to just a HasPullback condition on f.


Open in Gitpod

@github-actions github-actions bot added new-contributor This PR was made by a contributor with at most 5 merged PRs. Welcome to the community! t-category-theory Category theory labels Sep 19, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Sep 19, 2025

PR summary 108075f42a

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

+ instance [HasPullbacksAlong f] (h : P ⟶ Y) : HasPullback h (pullback.fst g f)

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.


No changes to technical debt.

You can run this locally as

./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
  • The relative value is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic.
  • The absolute value is the relative value divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).

@mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot added the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR (this label is automatically managed by a bot) label Sep 19, 2025
@mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot removed the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR (this label is automatically managed by a bot) label Oct 10, 2025
@mathlib4-dependent-issues-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mathlib4-merge-conflict-bot mathlib4-merge-conflict-bot added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Oct 10, 2025
@mathlib4-merge-conflict-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull request has conflicts, please merge master and resolve them.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. (this label is managed by a bot) label Oct 10, 2025
@joelriou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks!

bors merge

@ghost ghost added the ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. label Oct 10, 2025
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2025
…ts (#29812)

The `HasPullbacks` instance on a category `C` for defining the `baseChange` / pullback functor along a map `f : X -> Y` between their over categories can be weakened to just a `HasPullback` condition on `f`.

- [ ] depends on: #29795

Co-authored-by: jlh18 <josephhua73@yahoo.com>
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Oct 10, 2025

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title refactor: weaken HasPullbacks to HasPullback in MorphismProperty.Limits [Merged by Bors] - refactor: weaken HasPullbacks to HasPullback in MorphismProperty.Limits Oct 10, 2025
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Oct 10, 2025
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…Adjuction (#29810)

This PR replaces the global assumption of `HasPullback T` with the weaker assumption that pullbacks exist along the morphism only. 

For the sake of readability I also moved the variable `(f : X -> Y)` into the statement of each theorem. As instructed in #29795 (comment)

- [ ] depends on: #29795
- [ ] depends on: #29812

Co-authored-by: jlh18 <josephhua73@yahoo.com>
Jlh18 added a commit to Jlh18/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
…Adjuction (leanprover-community#29810)

This PR replaces the global assumption of `HasPullback T` with the weaker assumption that pullbacks exist along the morphism only. 

For the sake of readability I also moved the variable `(f : X -> Y)` into the statement of each theorem. As instructed in leanprover-community#29795 (comment)

- [ ] depends on: leanprover-community#29795
- [ ] depends on: leanprover-community#29812

Co-authored-by: jlh18 <josephhua73@yahoo.com>
BeibeiX0 pushed a commit to BeibeiX0/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
…ts (leanprover-community#29812)

The `HasPullbacks` instance on a category `C` for defining the `baseChange` / pullback functor along a map `f : X -> Y` between their over categories can be weakened to just a `HasPullback` condition on `f`.

- [ ] depends on: leanprover-community#29795

Co-authored-by: jlh18 <josephhua73@yahoo.com>
BeibeiX0 pushed a commit to BeibeiX0/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2025
…Adjuction (leanprover-community#29810)

This PR replaces the global assumption of `HasPullback T` with the weaker assumption that pullbacks exist along the morphism only. 

For the sake of readability I also moved the variable `(f : X -> Y)` into the statement of each theorem. As instructed in leanprover-community#29795 (comment)

- [ ] depends on: leanprover-community#29795
- [ ] depends on: leanprover-community#29812

Co-authored-by: jlh18 <josephhua73@yahoo.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new-contributor This PR was made by a contributor with at most 5 merged PRs. Welcome to the community! ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-category-theory Category theory

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants