[Merged by Bors] - feat: add to_additive linter checking whether additive decl exists#1881
Closed
fpvandoorn wants to merge 14 commits intomasterfrom
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - feat: add to_additive linter checking whether additive decl exists#1881fpvandoorn wants to merge 14 commits intomasterfrom
fpvandoorn wants to merge 14 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Ideally I would like to get a |
rwbarton
reviewed
Jan 30, 2023
13e9541 to
36c0b5e
Compare
36c0b5e to
19ff701
Compare
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Ebner <gebner@gebner.org>
Contributor
|
This PR/issue depends on: |
Contributor
|
Looks like a helpful feature bors d+ |
|
✌️ fpvandoorn can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Member
Author
|
bors merge |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
…1881) * Force the user to specify whether the additive declaration already exists. * Will raise a linter error if the user specified it wrongly * Requested on [Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/to_additive.20clashes)
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded:
|
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2023
It was quite smooth. I didn't have to make changes that I expect to change downstream files, so I left few porting notes. Comments that I didn't make into porting notes: * `attribute [local ext] ext` had to be changed to `attribute [local ext high] ext` * Sometimes `M ⊗ N` needed to be replaced by `M ⊗[R] N` in theorem statements. * I needed to make a few fixes in other files. I want to go through the library globally and fix this error, but I'm waiting on #1881 to get merged, because those two things would have many merge conflicts. Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
neither of the following are functional dependencies, just trying to minimize merge conflicts