Skip to content

chore: adaptations for leanprover/lean4#3124#93

Merged
kim-em merged 6 commits intobump/v4.6.0from
lean-pr-testing-3124
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

chore: adaptations for leanprover/lean4#3124#93
kim-em merged 6 commits intobump/v4.6.0from
lean-pr-testing-3124

Conversation

@kim-em
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@kim-em kim-em commented Jan 7, 2024

These are changes required to adapt to @leodemoura's leanprover/lean4#3124 PR introducing simprocs.

This relies on Leo's PR to Std: leanprover-community/batteries#496, and will be used in Mathlib's leanprover-community/mathlib4#9500 adaptation PR.


Note that the base of this PR is bump/v4.6.0. We won't merge this until the original Lean PR has landed in a nightly. At that point we'll need to merge this into nightly-testing here (whether reviewed or not!), and then into bump/v4.6.0 when it has been reviewed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@JLimperg JLimperg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great otherwise, thanks!

@kim-em kim-em merged commit 3ff7cbf into bump/v4.6.0 Jan 11, 2024
@kim-em kim-em deleted the lean-pr-testing-3124 branch January 11, 2024 05:40
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2024
These are adaptations required for Leo's implementation of simprocs from leanprover/lean4#3124. 

This is a PR to `bump/v4.6.0`. Before it can be merged we need to merge 
- [x] leanprover-community/batteries#496
- [x] leanprover-community/aesop#93
and then to update the lakefile so both dependencies point at the `bump/v4.6.0` branches.

I've updated a number of Mathlib tactics to adjust to the new type signatures in the simplifier, and these changes need to be reviewed carefully.



Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants