feat: add EIP2930 transactions#138
Merged
Merged
Conversation
fmoletta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2024
This PR is based on #138 (as they modify the same code), please merge it first **Motivation** Add support for EIP4844 transactions <!-- Why does this pull request exist? What are its goals? --> **Description** Add `EIP4844` transactions + needed trait and methods and integrate it into existing transaction-related code <!-- A clear and concise general description of the changes this PR introduces --> <!-- Link to issues: Resolves #111, Resolves #222 --> Closes #26 (evm already performs validations before executing so adding the transaction itself will sufice)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Add support for EIP2930 transaction
Description
Implements EIP2930Transaction + required methods & traits
Closes #24 (evm already performs validations before executing so adding the transaction itself will sufice)