Skip to content

Fixed intermitant e2e aggregator test on GKE.#53030

Merged
k8s-github-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
cheftako:e2e-aggr
Sep 26, 2017
Merged

Fixed intermitant e2e aggregator test on GKE.#53030
k8s-github-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
cheftako:e2e-aggr

Conversation

@cheftako
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does / why we need it: Issue was caused by another test cleaning up its namespace.
This caused the namespace controller to try to clean up that namespace.
This involves deleting all flunders under that namespace.
However the sample-apiserver was not honoring the namespace filter.
So the flunders for the test would randomly disappear.

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #50945

Special notes for your reviewer: Requires we fix the container image to contain this fix to work.

Release note:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 26, 2017
@cheftako
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/assign @mbohlool

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Sep 26, 2017
@mbohlool
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 26, 2017
Fixes issues/50945.
Issue was caused by another test cleaning up its namespace.
This caused the namespace controller to try to clean up that namespace.
This involves deleting all flunders under that namespace.
However the sample-apiserver was not honoring the namespace filter.
So the flunders for the test would randomly disappear.

Fixed image path to pick up newly built fixes from this PR.
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 26, 2017
@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Sep 26, 2017

Did we figure out why the test was only flaking on gke?

@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Sep 26, 2017

Good find. We should open an issue to dry out the places we indicate namespacedness of types (strategy and registration both require specifying it)

@mbohlool
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-unit

@mbohlool
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

@mbohlool mbohlool added this to the v1.8 milestone Sep 26, 2017
@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Sep 26, 2017

Were the container images already pushed? And if so, what branch were they built from?

@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Sep 26, 2017

cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-bugs @sttts @deads2k

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Sep 26, 2017
@mbohlool
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-bazel

@mbohlool
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

1 similar comment
@abgworrall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

@abgworrall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm
(restoring @mbohlool's lgtm)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 26, 2017
@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Sep 26, 2017

Change to the sample apiserver looks good. How was the 17v2 tag built? It should really be built from the release-1.7 branch with this fix applied

@mbohlool
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

@sttts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sttts commented Sep 26, 2017

/retest
/lgtm

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abgworrall, cheftako, mbohlool, sttts

Associated issue: 50945

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 26, 2017
@fejta-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to @fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

1 similar comment
@fejta-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to @fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

@abgworrall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

2 similar comments
@abgworrall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

@mbohlool
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

@abgworrall abgworrall added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 26, 2017
@abgworrall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

abgworrall commented Sep 26, 2017

Holding this pending an answer to #53030 (comment)

@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Sep 26, 2017

talked with @cheftako, the image was build from the release-1.7 branch

@liggitt liggitt removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 26, 2017
@cheftako
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@liggitt I built it from the 1.7.3 tag. If you want I can go to the head of that branch and build it.

@liggitt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

liggitt commented Sep 26, 2017

@cheftako as long as it was 1.7, that's fine for now. we should also commit this fix to the actual 1.7 branch

@abgworrall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@abgworrall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51648, 53030, 53009). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here..

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit c7c3277 into kubernetes:master Sep 26, 2017
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
…3030-upstream-release-1.8

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

Automated cherry pick of #53030

Cherry pick of #53030 on release-1.8.

#53030: Fixed intermittant e2e aggregator test on GKE.

**What this PR does / why we need it**: Issue was caused by another test cleaning up its namespace.
This caused the namespace controller to try to clean up that namespace.
This involves deleting all flunders under that namespace.
However the sample-apiserver was not honoring the namespace filter.
So the flunders for the test would randomly disappear.

Relates to issue  #50945

**Special notes for your reviewer**: Requires we fix the container image to contain this fix to work.
@k8s-cherrypick-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Commit found in the "release-1.8" branch appears to be this PR. Removing the "cherrypick-candidate" label. If this is an error find help to get your PR picked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[e2e test failure] [sig-api-machinery] Aggregator Should be able to support the 1.7 Sample API Server using the current Aggregator

9 participants