Skip to content

[KEP 3960]: Promote PodLifecycleSleepAction to stable #4866

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:masterfrom
AxeZhan:ga3960
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

[KEP 3960]: Promote PodLifecycleSleepAction to stable #4866
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:masterfrom
AxeZhan:ga3960

Conversation

@AxeZhan

@AxeZhan AxeZhan commented Sep 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • One-line PR description:
    PodLifecycleSleepAction is planned to graduate to ga in 1.32.
  • Other comments:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. labels Sep 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 21, 2024
@AxeZhan

AxeZhan commented Sep 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

No tests added and there's no motivation/code changes in GA. So barely nothing updated.

/cc @thockin as previous reviewer.
/cc @wojtek-t for PRR. (nothing updated actually)

@AxeZhan

AxeZhan commented Sep 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Aslo /cc @SergeyKanzhelev
As there's a new owner file added with your name.

@thockin thockin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 22, 2024
@wojtek-t wojtek-t self-assigned this Sep 23, 2024

@wojtek-t wojtek-t left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two minor nits - other than that LGTM.

Comment thread keps/prod-readiness/sig-node/3960.yaml
Comment thread keps/sig-node/3960-pod-lifecycle-sleep-action/kep.yaml Outdated
@wojtek-t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'm approving the PRR, but adding a hold to have the two nits addressed.

/approve PRR
/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 23, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 23, 2024
@wojtek-t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/lgtm
/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Sep 23, 2024
- [x] (R) Ensure GA e2e tests meet requirements for [Conformance Tests](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md)
- [x] (R) Minimum Two Week Window for GA e2e tests to prove flake free
- [x] (R) Graduation criteria is in place
- [ ] (R) [all GA Endpoints](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1806) must be hit by [Conformance Tests](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add this as a graduation criteria for stable. Which tests will be marked as Conformance?

@AxeZhan AxeZhan Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a link pointed to the e2e test.
Also, should we unmark this line first and then remark it once the e2e tests are promoted to conformance?

@@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ Items marked with (R) are required *prior to targeting to a milestone / release*
- [x] (R) Design details are appropriately documented
- [x] (R) Test plan is in place, giving consideration to SIG Architecture and SIG Testing input (including test refactors)
- [x] e2e Tests for all Beta API Operations (endpoints)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tests mentioned later in the doc are still pointing to the alpha job: https://testgrid.k8s.io/presubmits-kubernetes-nonblocking#pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-alpha-features Why alpha? Is there a better link?

@AxeZhan AxeZhan Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So although the job name contains alpha, it actually runs many non-alpha feature test.
We mentioned this test in the doc because we added this specific fg to the test config(kubernetes/test-infra#31959), so that the test for this feature can be run periodically. It doesn't care if the feature is in alpha stage or beta stage.
We can change the link, but this should be done after this fature is GAed, and the tests are run periodically in another job?
For now, I think this is the only job which periodically run the test for this feature.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2024

@thockin thockin left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 30, 2024
@kannon92

kannon92 commented Oct 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/assign @SergeyKanzhelev

This still needs a sig approval.

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AxeZhan, SergeyKanzhelev, thockin, wojtek-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6893af8 into kubernetes:master Oct 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.32 milestone Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants