Skip to content

Rebase on master and fix conflicts#12

Closed
migueldvb wants to merge 0 commit into
keflavich:hitranfrom
migueldvb:hi
Closed

Rebase on master and fix conflicts#12
migueldvb wants to merge 0 commit into
keflavich:hitranfrom
migueldvb:hi

Conversation

@migueldvb

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I have rebased the hitran branch on master and fixed the conflicts in CHANGES and docs/index.rst.

@keflavich

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Whoa... I am not entirely sure what to do with this. I think I have to do the rebasing myself, because I can't just merge this. I'm not sure github really supports friendly rebasing. @bsipocz, do you know anything about this?

@migueldvb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Yes, maybe better to fix this in your hitran branch. You could discard e5c3ace to rebase without conflicts and these changes can be added later..

@keflavich

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

OK, I rebased. Now these match...

@keflavich

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Weird... I think this PR is broken. I'm pretty sure both branches are identical except for commit names.

@migueldvb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Sorry, I think the commit hashes changed when I rebased the branch. We can close this PR now?

@keflavich

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I think so. You should double-check by rebasing against my branch and see if it goes to zero changes

@migueldvb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Yes, that worked! Pushig the rebased branch closed this PR automatically.

@bsipocz

bsipocz commented Nov 4, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Whoa... I am not entirely sure what to do with this. I think I have to do the rebasing myself, because I can't just merge this. I'm not sure github really supports friendly rebasing. @bsipocz, do you know anything about this?

When you rebase, you need to force push the rebased version. But here you wanted to rebase the original branch in the fork compared to master in the main repo. To do that you need to have commit rights to @keflavich's branch to force push back the rebase. So it's expected not to work.

@migueldvb migueldvb deleted the hi branch February 6, 2018 00:10
keflavich added a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026
# This is the 1st commit message:

add HiGal module

more cleanup

add changelog

it is possible for a cutout to be missing; we need to allow for that.
Also, the hack I had before isn't needed when you appropriately query
for multiple wavelengths

remove some comments, still not done with the PR

minor correction

added basic docs

pep8 fixes.  The bracket closures DO match the indentation, though.
pep8 lies sometimes.

add local tests and cleanup some testing

more interactive tests revealed that my hacks didn't really work, this
commit has some fixes

move everything into astroquery.herschel.higal

update relative paths

whitespace

# This is the commit message #2:

update tests

# This is the commit message #3:

the higal server genuinely isn't showing anything when I search online now

# This is the commit message #4:

add HiGal module

# This is the commit message #5:

more cleanup

# This is the commit message #6:

add changelog

# This is the commit message #7:

it is possible for a cutout to be missing; we need to allow for that.
Also, the hack I had before isn't needed when you appropriately query
for multiple wavelengths

# This is the commit message #8:

remove some comments, still not done with the PR

# This is the commit message #9:

minor correction

# This is the commit message #10:

added basic docs

# This is the commit message #11:

pep8 fixes.  The bracket closures DO match the indentation, though.
pep8 lies sometimes.

# This is the commit message #12:

add local tests and cleanup some testing

# This is the commit message #13:

more interactive tests revealed that my hacks didn't really work, this
commit has some fixes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants