Skip to content

Docs: Update README to use parserBuilder() instead of parser()#499

Merged
bdemers merged 1 commit intoREADME-0-11-0from
docs-parserBuilder
Oct 1, 2019
Merged

Docs: Update README to use parserBuilder() instead of parser()#499
bdemers merged 1 commit intoREADME-0-11-0from
docs-parserBuilder

Conversation

@bdemers
Copy link
Member

@bdemers bdemers commented Sep 24, 2019

Doc: #486
Fixes: #494

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3453fca on docs-parserBuilder into 50fc773 on README-0-11-0.

@bdemers bdemers added this to the 0.11.0 milestone Sep 24, 2019
@bdemers bdemers self-assigned this Sep 24, 2019
@bdemers bdemers changed the title Update README to use parserBuilder() instead of parser() Docs: Update README to use parserBuilder() instead of parser() Sep 24, 2019
@bdemers bdemers merged commit 31a0c6c into README-0-11-0 Oct 1, 2019
@bdemers bdemers deleted the docs-parserBuilder branch October 1, 2019 16:05
lhazlewood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2020
- Docs: Adds section to README covering custom object parsing (#500)
- Docs: Add note about JwtParserBuilder creating an immutable JwtParser (#508)
Doc: #486
Fixes: #494
Doc: #495
Fixes: #171
lhazlewood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2020
- Docs: Adds section to README covering custom object parsing (#500)
- Docs: Add note about JwtParserBuilder creating an immutable JwtParser (#508)
Doc: #486
Fixes: #494
Doc: #495
Fixes: #171

Updated documentation and changelog to reflect the new Gson extension. Fixes #410. (#476)
lhazlewood added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2020
…#559)

- Docs: Adds section to README covering custom object parsing (#500)
- Docs: Add note about JwtParserBuilder creating an immutable JwtParser (#508)
Doc: #486
Fixes: #494
Doc: #495
Fixes: #171

Updated documentation and changelog to reflect the new Gson extension. Fixes #410. (#476)

Co-authored-by: Brian Demers <brian.demers@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants