Skip to content

Einheitliche Terminologie für contenthistory#3730

Closed
chmst wants to merge 162 commits intojoomlagerman:5.4-devfrom
chmst:60-com-contenthistory-sys-ini
Closed

Einheitliche Terminologie für contenthistory#3730
chmst wants to merge 162 commits intojoomlagerman:5.4-devfrom
chmst:60-com-contenthistory-sys-ini

Conversation

@chmst
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@chmst chmst commented Mar 19, 2026

Pull Request für Issue #

Zusammenfassung der Änderungen

Überall wird der Begriff "Version" verwendet nur hier nicht.

grafik

https://forum.joomla.de/thread/23423-button-versionen-in-beitr%C3%A4ge-erscheint-nicht/?postID=180559#post180559

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 19, 2026 09:32
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Dieser PR passt die deutschen Backend-Übersetzungen der Komponente com_contenthistory an, um die Terminologie rund um „Version(en)“ konsistenter im Joomla-Sprachpaket zu machen.

Changes:

  • Umbenennung des Komponentennamens von „Inhaltsverlauf“ zu „Versionshistorie“.
  • Anpassung der XML-Beschreibung der Komponente auf „Versionshistorie-Komponente“.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

Comment thread administrator/language/de-DE/com_contenthistory.sys.ini
@tecpromotion
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@chmst gerne auf 5.4 rebasen.

zero-24
zero-24 previously approved these changes Mar 19, 2026
@tecpromotion tecpromotion self-assigned this Mar 19, 2026
@tecpromotion tecpromotion changed the base branch from 6.0-dev to 5.4-dev March 20, 2026 14:01
@tecpromotion tecpromotion dismissed zero-24’s stale review March 20, 2026 14:01

The base branch was changed.

@tecpromotion
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rebase war wohl dann doch nicht das Richtige.

@tecpromotion tecpromotion mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2026
5 tasks
tecpromotion added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants