Conversation
Contributor
Greptile SummaryThis PR adds Confidence Score: 5/5Safe to merge — minimal, well-precedented change with a verified aqua-registry entry and a GitHub fallback. Single-line addition following the established pattern for aqua backends across the registry; rvben/rumdl is confirmed present in the aqua-registry, and the github fallback is preserved. No files require special attention. Important Files Changed
Flowchart%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
A[User requests rumdl] --> B{Try aqua backend}
B -- success --> C[Install via aqua:rvben/rumdl]
B -- failure --> D[Fallback: github:rvben/rumdl]
D --> E[Install via GitHub releases]
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "registry: use aqua for rumdl" | Re-trigger Greptile |
jdx
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2026
### 🚀 Features - **(backend)** add global libc preference by @jdx in [#9404](#9404) - opt-in to pre-release versions for github and aqua backends by @jakedgy in [#9329](#9329) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes - **(backend)** allow unresolved latest opt-in by @jdx in [#9401](#9401) - **(install)** stop rewriting healthy runtime symlinks by @jdx in [#9410](#9410) - **(node)** route musl tarball URLs to unofficial-builds by @jdx in [#9409](#9409) - **(prune)** skip remote version resolution for tracked configs by @jdx in [#9406](#9406) - **(schema)** allow array values in tool additionalProperties by @JP-Ellis in [#9400](#9400) ### 📦️ Dependency Updates - bump communique to 1.1.2 by @jdx in [#9402](#9402) ### 📦 Registry - use aqua for rumdl by @scop in [#9397](#9397) ### Chore - **(ci)** improve pr-closer workflow by @jdx in [#9403](#9403) - **(release)** stop appending sponsor blurb when communique succeeds by @jdx in [#9395](#9395) ### New Contributors - @JP-Ellis made their first contribution in [#9400](#9400)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.