Skip to content

Conversation

@kainino0x
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3864

@kainino0x kainino0x added copyediting Pure editorial stuff (copyediting, *.bs file syntax, etc.) needs-cts-issue This change requires tests (or would need tests if accepted), but may not have a CTS issue filed yet labels Apr 18, 2023
@kainino0x kainino0x added this to the V1.0 milestone Apr 18, 2023
@kainino0x kainino0x requested review from mwyrzykowski and toji April 18, 2023 04:56
Copy link
Member

@toji toji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But... but... 640 ought to be enough for anybody! ☹️

LGTM, and pour one out for the death of a spec "easter egg".

@kainino0x kainino0x merged commit 24224df into gpuweb:main Apr 18, 2023
@kainino0x kainino0x deleted the 640 branch April 18, 2023 22:22
@kainino0x kainino0x removed the needs-cts-issue This change requires tests (or would need tests if accepted), but may not have a CTS issue filed yet label Apr 27, 2023
takahirox added a commit to takahirox/cts that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2023
To follow the WebGPU spec update
gpuweb/gpuweb#4050
kainino0x pushed a commit to gpuweb/cts that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
blitz-research pushed a commit to blitz-research/dawn that referenced this pull request May 3, 2023
To follow the WebGPU spec update
gpuweb/gpuweb#4050

Bug: dawn:1767
Change-Id: Iec5c60de7af5cb8b8e1baa7fc378a6551c6b5bd1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/129380
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Takahiro <hogehoge@gachapin.jp>
ErichDonGubler pushed a commit to mozilla/gpuweb-cts that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

copyediting Pure editorial stuff (copyediting, *.bs file syntax, etc.)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

maxBindingsPerBindGroup has arbitrary limit of 640

2 participants