* Initial implementation of CometRewards with multiplier

* Simply implementation a bit

* Refactor slightly for more readability

* Update unit tests

* Implement setRewardsClaimed (compound-finance#703)

This PR introduces a `setRewardsClaimed` function that gives the admin the ability to set rewards claimed for any user. This gives us the ability to initialize a new reward distribution that doesn't necessarily have to retroactively reward all past usage of Comet. 

We would have to compute off-chain the amount that each user would be able to claim at a specific block number `x` and write it on-chain via the `setRewardsClaimed` function. This allows us to essentially set the start time of the rewards accrual to be after that specific block number `x`.

* Add scenarios for testing reward multipliers

* Re-implement multiplier logic by storing multiplier in RewardConfig

* Add a unit test to sanity check zeroing out retroactive rewards for users

* Initial implementation of CometRewards with multiplier

* Simply implementation a bit

* Refactor slightly for more readability

* Update unit tests

* Implement setRewardsClaimed (#703)

This PR introduces a `setRewardsClaimed` function that gives the admin the ability to set rewards claimed for any user. This gives us the ability to initialize a new reward distribution that doesn't necessarily have to retroactively reward all past usage of Comet. 

We would have to compute off-chain the amount that each user would be able to claim at a specific block number `x` and write it on-chain via the `setRewardsClaimed` function. This allows us to essentially set the start time of the rewards accrual to be after that specific block number `x`.

* Add scenarios for testing reward multipliers

* Re-implement multiplier logic by storing multiplier in RewardConfig

* Add a unit test to sanity check zeroing out retroactive rewards for users

* Initial implementation of CometRewards with multiplier

* Simply implementation a bit

* Refactor slightly for more readability

* Update unit tests

* Implement setRewardsClaimed (compound-finance#703)

This PR introduces a `setRewardsClaimed` function that gives the admin the ability to set rewards claimed for any user. This gives us the ability to initialize a new reward distribution that doesn't necessarily have to retroactively reward all past usage of Comet. 

We would have to compute off-chain the amount that each user would be able to claim at a specific block number `x` and write it on-chain via the `setRewardsClaimed` function. This allows us to essentially set the start time of the rewards accrual to be after that specific block number `x`.

* Add scenarios for testing reward multipliers

* Re-implement multiplier logic by storing multiplier in RewardConfig

* Add a unit test to sanity check zeroing out retroactive rewards for users

* Initial implementation of CometRewards with multiplier

* Simply implementation a bit

* Refactor slightly for more readability

* Update unit tests

* Implement setRewardsClaimed (#703)

This PR introduces a `setRewardsClaimed` function that gives the admin the ability to set rewards claimed for any user. This gives us the ability to initialize a new reward distribution that doesn't necessarily have to retroactively reward all past usage of Comet. 

We would have to compute off-chain the amount that each user would be able to claim at a specific block number `x` and write it on-chain via the `setRewardsClaimed` function. This allows us to essentially set the start time of the rewards accrual to be after that specific block number `x`.

* Add scenarios for testing reward multipliers

* Re-implement multiplier logic by storing multiplier in RewardConfig

* Add a unit test to sanity check zeroing out retroactive rewards for users

* Initial implementation of CometRewards with multiplier

* Simply implementation a bit

* Refactor slightly for more readability

* Update unit tests

* Implement setRewardsClaimed (#703)

This PR introduces a `setRewardsClaimed` function that gives the admin the ability to set rewards claimed for any user. This gives us the ability to initialize a new reward distribution that doesn't necessarily have to retroactively reward all past usage of Comet. 

We would have to compute off-chain the amount that each user would be able to claim at a specific block number `x` and write it on-chain via the `setRewardsClaimed` function. This allows us to essentially set the start time of the rewards accrual to be after that specific block number `x`.

* Add scenarios for testing reward multipliers

* Re-implement multiplier logic by storing multiplier in RewardConfig

* Add a unit test to sanity check zeroing out retroactive rewards for users

* Arbitrum deployment

* Arbitrum mainnet (#717)

* update github actions

* add configuration file

* deploy script

* add inbox to roots

* update hardhat config

* update etherscan.ts

* template string in Spider trace fn

* Arbitrum whale

* MAINNET_TIMELOCK instead of mainnetTimelock.address

* add inbox to mainnet/usdc relations

* missing whale error

* add LINK, LINK whale

add Arbitrum SDK; bump hardhat-etherscan version; ARBISCAN_KEY; add l1GatewayRouter to roots; update getCompWhales

* CometRewards with multiplier (#702)

* Initial implementation of CometRewards with multiplier

* Simply implementation a bit

* Refactor slightly for more readability

* Update unit tests

* Implement setRewardsClaimed (#703)

This PR introduces a `setRewardsClaimed` function that gives the admin the ability to set rewards claimed for any user. This gives us the ability to initialize a new reward distribution that doesn't necessarily have to retroactively reward all past usage of Comet. 

We would have to compute off-chain the amount that each user would be able to claim at a specific block number `x` and write it on-chain via the `setRewardsClaimed` function. This allows us to essentially set the start time of the rewards accrual to be after that specific block number `x`.

* Add scenarios for testing reward multipliers

* Re-implement multiplier logic by storing multiplier in RewardConfig

* Add a unit test to sanity check zeroing out retroactive rewards for users

* restore hardhat-etherscan version; createCrossChainProposal; Goerli l1GatewayRouter

* update ArbitrumBridgeScenario

* refactor, rename in relayArbitrumMessage

* Pin Solidity version (#731)

* replace LINK with ARB

* pull in ARB in deploy.ts

* replace nock with undici in VerifyTest

* specify shanghai hardfork

* Emit event when setting rewards claimed (#736)

* Update aliases to include arbitrum prefix

* updates from #719 to enable proposals

* Fix spidering when using explicit address in relations config; use addresses to indicate ERC20 proxies in relations

* Adjust timelock delay on testnet

* Move arbitrum cross-chain scenario into cross-chain governance scenarios file

* Add pauseGuardian for arbitrum goerli

* Add custom chain for arbitrum goerli to verify on etherscan

* Add api key for arbitrum goerli

* Modified deployment roots from GitHub Actions

* add Arbitrum pauseGuardian address to config

* SweepableBridgeReceiver, tests (#733)

* Add custom chain in hardhat etherscan config for arbitrum

* Modified deployment roots from GitHub Actions

* Arbitrum proposals (#719)

* Arbitrum proposals

* update Arbitrum aliases in proposals

* update asset supply caps

* spider in verify()

* add prices to BulkerScenario

* restore original asset variables; update supply cap expectations; enable diffState test for Arbitrum-Goerli

* Add arb to enact-migration.yaml

* Modified migration from GitHub Actions

* Finalize arb gas estimation

* update proposal description

* update diffState test

* add action to set v2 COMP speeds for USDT to 0; update Arbitrum baseSupplySpeed

* Skip calling verify on migrations that are already enacted

* Update COMP amount to bridge and hardcoded gas price; modify proposal text to be more specific about shifting COMP distributions from USDT v2 to Arbitrum

* Change skip to skipVerify

* Add COMP whale for arbitrum-goerli

* Modified migration from GitHub Actions

---------

Co-authored-by: kevincheng96 <kevincheng96@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: GitHub Actions Bot <>

* Small fixes for Arbitrum scenarios

---------

Co-authored-by: Kevin Cheng <kevincheng96@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: GitHub Actions Bot <>