Deploy cWETHv3 to Goerli#646
Conversation
|
do we need to add |
I don't think so since those actually take the deployment as an input (e.g. "usdc"). |
bf72cea to
a9f9584
Compare
7f2f2e9 to
e1573a5
Compare
deployments/goerli/weth/deploy.ts
Outdated
| const wstETH = await deploymentManager.existing('wstETH', '0x4942BBAf745f235e525BAff49D31450810EDed5b', 'goerli'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Import shared contracts from cUSDCv3 | ||
| // Note: We need to first spider the contracts on the cUSDC base. Consider moving this spider logic into `fromDep`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the future we could also have a fromDep to return all aliases as object and could destructure const { cometAdmin, cometFactory, 'configurator:implementation': $configuratorImpl, ... } = await deploymentManager.fromDep(network, base) and spider from there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Eh, this breaks putAlias, which is why it is the way it is currently
df1eb4b to
887a1cd
Compare
|
Rebased on top of |
35c4bc3 to
9f9a917
Compare
e69f339 to
e1eed58
Compare
52fc7ce to
980f399
Compare
b7a82af to
b3e9611
Compare
| const signer = await deploymentManager.getSigner(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Declare existing assets as aliases | ||
| const WETH = await deploymentManager.existing('WETH', '0x42a71137C09AE83D8d05974960fd607d40033499', 'goerli'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like there are a number of different instances of the WETH9 contract on Goerli.
Looks like Uniswap uses 0xB4FBF271143F4FBf7B91A5ded31805e42b2208d6 on Goerli: https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v3/reference/deployments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, for some reason our Goerli USDC deployment has its own version of WETH. I chose to use that same WETH to be consistent.
852c6d1 to
d302b26
Compare
ab43364 to
45907b1
Compare
3d6e9dc to
a4f3e6a
Compare
a4f3e6a to
10a3eec
Compare
This PR adds a new `goerli-weth` base and deploy script for the Goerli cWETHv3 deploy. The deploy script is very similar to the mainnet cWETHv3 script. The main differences are: - Deploying price feeds for stETH / ETH and cbETH / ETH - Pulling in extra testnet/cross-chain contracts such as `fauceteer` and `fxRoot` using `fromDep` - Cloning over `cbETH` from mainnet - Minting `cbETH` to `fauceteer`
* Proposal to enable cWETHv3 market * Modify proposal to add rewards * Update the supply caps based on Gauntlet recommendations (#629) https://hackmd.io/wncIvkFTReWUe2AMMK2ezA?view * Refactor proposal to make market live (#640) * If there are migrations, don't run the non-migrations This allows a proposal branch to pass CI if the migration is required and is generally the intention for migration branches. However an env var is still supported to override and force running the non-migration, too. * Final changes to supply caps; proposal text; WETH transfer amt (#662) Also copy bulker to usdc roots and fix scen test fixes * Deploy cWETHv3 to Goerli (#646) This PR adds a new `goerli-weth` base and deploy script for the Goerli cWETHv3 deploy. The deploy script is very similar to the mainnet cWETHv3 script. The main differences are: - Deploying price feeds for stETH / ETH and cbETH / ETH - Pulling in extra testnet/cross-chain contracts such as `fauceteer` and `fxRoot` using `fromDep` - Cloning over `cbETH` from mainnet - Minting `cbETH` to `fauceteer` * Modified migration from GitHub Actions Co-authored-by: Kevin Cheng <kevincheng96@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: GitHub Actions Bot <>
* Mainnet ETH Deployment * Update Github Actions to include mainnet-eth * ETH-base bulker scenario * WstETHPriceFeed + tests (#600) * Non-ETH and ETH bulker scenarios (all actions in one txn) * Mainnet WETH Bulker (#611) * Add a supply cap constraint and set initial caps to 0 for cWETHv3 * Update the collateral params based on Gauntlet recommendations (#628) https://hackmd.io/wncIvkFTReWUe2AMMK2ezA?view * Price feeds for WETH deployment + Bulker changes for OZ audit (#625) This PR implements and modifies price feeds to support the upcoming WETH deployment. The favored plan so far is to use ETH-denominated price feeds as opposed to USD price feeds, but stick with using 8 decimals for prices to avoid having to change the `Comet` and `Configurator` implementations. This would require: - A new wrapper price feed (`ScalingPriceFeed.sol`) that scales prices up or down to 8 decimals - A new `ConstantPriceFeed` that always returns 1e8 for the `WETH` base asset, since should always hold a 1:1 value with ETH - Modifications to the `WstETHPriceFeed` to return prices in terms of ETH instead of USD This is an alternative approach to #626, which is a more complex change but could be a better long-term solution. *Note: This PR also now contains the changes from #634 and #635, which address some suggestions made by OZ for their audit of `WstETHPriceFeed` and `Bulker`.* * Refactor deploy to support second markets (#639) * Refactor deploy to support second markets * Add a fromDep to deployment manager which can be used for sharing dependency contracts from another deployment * Always attempt to initialize storage if needed, and not necessarily as gov * Always deploy an initial implementation contract instead of using the factory marker * Only take gov admin actions if we own the cometAdmin * Expose the primitives necessary for a proposal to configurate later, if/when admin cannot * Add an env flag for migration constraint to skip non-migration scenarios * Defer reading current config in modern constraint (bugfix) * Add recipient to token sourcing blacklist * WETH deployment audit changes (#641) These are changes in response to the WETH deployment [audit](https://gist.github.com/andresbach/a01686b1ef8bdf51d46046f2cfc93307) conducted by OZ: - **L01 - Lack of input validation** - We originally avoided zero address checks because there are a vast amount of accidental addresses that can be set here and checking for a specific one seems unnecessary. However, we have reconsidered that position after seeing the reasons for including a zero address check listed in this [post](https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/removing-address-0x0-checks-from-openzeppelin-contracts/2222/13). - **L02 - Improper implementation of Chainlink AggregatorV3Interface** - We updated the hard-coded return values for `roundId` and `answeredInRound` to be 1 to comply with the Chainlink specification. - **L04 - Incomplete/confusing documentation** - We updated the documentation based on the provided suggestions. Our full audit responses are [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A8TrUdTtD7DXr1U5HOqSS1Xl81rjBZdlDC7LS4No4Bw). * Spider USDC deployment before calling `fromDep` (#644) We need to spider the `USDC` deployment before calling `fromDep` on it so all the aliases are populated in the cache. Otherwise, `fromDep` may try to import an `undefined` contract. There are many approaches to this and this PR takes the simplest approach of spidering in the deploy script. Another approach could be to handle the spidering directly in `fromDep`. * Convert from scientific notation to bigint in configuration (#643) This PR adds a new `ScientificNotation` string type to `NetworkConfiguration` that is required for certain fields (e.g. `supplyCap`, `baseMinForRewards`). The configuration parser will safely convert these values into bigints without losing precision; with one caveat, scientific notations that use decimals in the coefficient still run the risk of precision loss because those are converted directly to javascript numbers. * Explicit supply cap constraint for failing bulker scen (#648) * Add tracking index bounds unit tests for WETH (#645) * Update params and rate model final numbers for deployment * OnChainLiquidator (#642) Update the reference liquidator to source from more pools and generally be more robust * Fix fromDep to spider the dependency and load the contract from it (#652) * bump targetReserves in LiquidationBotScenarios (#653) * delete CURVE_REGISTRY (#654) * OnChainLiquidator, not Liquidator (#655) * Combined model based on Gauntlet's first and second recommendations (#656) * Wrap and unwrap native token as base asset in Bulker (#659) * Add tests for supply native token; clean up * Change supplyStETH to use stETH amount instead of wstETH amount; add scenarios * Tweak comments * Supplying uint256.max collateral reverts in WETH deposit not Comet * Modified deployment roots from GitHub Actions * Proposal to enable cWETHv3 market (#608) * Proposal to enable cWETHv3 market * Modify proposal to add rewards * Update the supply caps based on Gauntlet recommendations (#629) https://hackmd.io/wncIvkFTReWUe2AMMK2ezA?view * Refactor proposal to make market live (#640) * If there are migrations, don't run the non-migrations This allows a proposal branch to pass CI if the migration is required and is generally the intention for migration branches. However an env var is still supported to override and force running the non-migration, too. * Final changes to supply caps; proposal text; WETH transfer amt (#662) Also copy bulker to usdc roots and fix scen test fixes * Deploy cWETHv3 to Goerli (#646) This PR adds a new `goerli-weth` base and deploy script for the Goerli cWETHv3 deploy. The deploy script is very similar to the mainnet cWETHv3 script. The main differences are: - Deploying price feeds for stETH / ETH and cbETH / ETH - Pulling in extra testnet/cross-chain contracts such as `fauceteer` and `fxRoot` using `fromDep` - Cloning over `cbETH` from mainnet - Minting `cbETH` to `fauceteer` * Modified migration from GitHub Actions Co-authored-by: Kevin Cheng <kevincheng96@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: scott-silver <scott@compound.finance> Co-authored-by: GitHub Actions Bot <>
This PR adds a new
goerli-wethbase and deploy script for the Goerli cWETHv3 deploy.The deploy script is very similar to the mainnet cWETHv3 script. The main differences are:
fauceteerandfxRootusingfromDepcbETHfrom mainnetcbETHtofauceteer