Remove joint consensus (ProposedMembers) support.#47
Merged
bdarnell merged 1 commit intocockroachdb:masterfrom Sep 10, 2014
Merged
Remove joint consensus (ProposedMembers) support.#47bdarnell merged 1 commit intocockroachdb:masterfrom
bdarnell merged 1 commit intocockroachdb:masterfrom
Conversation
This was present in the original raft paper but was removed from the final thesis because simpler protections suffice as long as only one node is added or removed at a time. Use the term "observer" consistently for non-voting members.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's diff between non-member and observer?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A non-member is just a node that's not a part of the group at all; it probably doesn't need to be named here. Both observers and members receive log broadcasts but only members vote.
Member
|
LGTM |
tbg
referenced
this pull request
in tbg/cockroach
Aug 31, 2016
We have been seeing long startup times which disappear spontaneously. During a
restart of the beta cluster, the following goroutine was observed, which suggests
that we were spending a lot of time GCing replicas on startup.
engine ??:0 _Cfunc_DBIterNext(cockroachdb#324, cockroachdb#323, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
engine rocksdb.go:1135 (*rocksDBIterator).Next(cockroachdb#235)
storage replica_data_iter.go:104 (*ReplicaDataIterator).Next(cockroachdb#316)
storage store.go:1748 (*Store).destroyReplicaData(#109, cockroachdb#317, 0, 0)
storage store.go:841 (*Store).Start.func2(0x101b, cockroachdb#300, 0x36, 0x40, cockroachdb#301, 0x36, 0x40, cockroachdb#315, 0x3, 0x4, ...)
storage store.go:734 IterateRangeDescriptors.func1(cockroachdb#306, 0x40, 0x41, cockroachdb#307, 0x92, 0x92, cockroachdb#341, 0, 0x186c, 0x4000, ...)
engine mvcc.go:1593 MVCCIterate(cockroachdb#329, #68, #47, #81, cockroachdb#232, 0x9, 0x10, cockroachdb#233, 0xb, 0x10, ...)
storage store.go:738 IterateRangeDescriptors(cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #47, #81, cockroachdb#195, #179, #110)
storage store.go:867 (*Store).Start(#109, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #179, #185, 0x1)
server node.go:405 (*Node).initStores(#78, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #98, 0x1, 0x1, #179, 0, #55)
server node.go:330 (*Node).start(#78, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #42, #129, #98, 0x1, 0x1, 0, 0, ...)
server server.go:431 (*Server).Start(#5, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #95, 0x1)
cli start.go:368 runStart(#34, #178, 0, 0x9, 0, 0)
cobra command.go:599 (*Command).execute(#34, #177, 0x9, 0x9, #34, #177)
cobra command.go:689 (*Command).ExecuteC(#33, #70, cockroachdb#343, #72)
cobra command.go:648 (*Command).Execute(#33, #71, cockroachdb#343)
cli cli.go:96 Run(#64, 0xa, 0xa, 0, 0)
main main.go:37 main()
tbg
referenced
this pull request
in tbg/cockroach
Aug 31, 2016
We have been seeing long startup times which disappear spontaneously. During a
restart of the beta cluster, the following goroutine was observed, which suggests
that we were spending a lot of time GCing replicas on startup.
engine ??:0 _Cfunc_DBIterNext(cockroachdb#324, cockroachdb#323, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
engine rocksdb.go:1135 (*rocksDBIterator).Next(cockroachdb#235)
storage replica_data_iter.go:104 (*ReplicaDataIterator).Next(cockroachdb#316)
storage store.go:1748 (*Store).destroyReplicaData(#109, cockroachdb#317, 0, 0)
storage store.go:841 (*Store).Start.func2(0x101b, cockroachdb#300, 0x36, 0x40, cockroachdb#301, 0x36, 0x40, cockroachdb#315, 0x3, 0x4, ...)
storage store.go:734 IterateRangeDescriptors.func1(cockroachdb#306, 0x40, 0x41, cockroachdb#307, 0x92, 0x92, cockroachdb#341, 0, 0x186c, 0x4000, ...)
engine mvcc.go:1593 MVCCIterate(cockroachdb#329, #68, #47, #81, cockroachdb#232, 0x9, 0x10, cockroachdb#233, 0xb, 0x10, ...)
storage store.go:738 IterateRangeDescriptors(cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #47, #81, cockroachdb#195, #179, #110)
storage store.go:867 (*Store).Start(#109, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #179, #185, 0x1)
server node.go:405 (*Node).initStores(#78, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #98, 0x1, 0x1, #179, 0, #55)
server node.go:330 (*Node).start(#78, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #42, #129, #98, 0x1, 0x1, 0, 0, ...)
server server.go:431 (*Server).Start(#5, cockroachdb#330, cockroachdb#196, #95, 0x1)
cli start.go:368 runStart(#34, #178, 0, 0x9, 0, 0)
cobra command.go:599 (*Command).execute(#34, #177, 0x9, 0x9, #34, #177)
cobra command.go:689 (*Command).ExecuteC(#33, #70, cockroachdb#343, #72)
cobra command.go:648 (*Command).Execute(#33, #71, cockroachdb#343)
cli cli.go:96 Run(#64, 0xa, 0xa, 0, 0)
main main.go:37 main()
soniabhishek
pushed a commit
to soniabhishek/cockroach
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2017
…g_project_workflow Feature multi mapping project workflow
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was present in the original raft paper but was removed from the final
thesis because simpler protections suffice as long as only one node is added
or removed at a time.
Use the term "observer" consistently for non-voting members.
@spencerkimball