Update docs to reflect new signal forwarding semantics #16430
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I am a new uv user and I was reading the docs to better understand the project scope & best practices. The section on signal forwarding with
uv runcaught my eye because I've used tools that use SIGHUP to trigger config reloads or SIGUSR1/2 to enable debugging/profiling/etc so I was a little concerned about using a runner that might block those signals. After some searching in issues/PRs, I found that this behavior was actually changed earlier this year to forward additional signals (awesome!) and thought I would update the docs and save the next person/llm from thinking their tool won't work as expected if it uses custom signal handling.Thanks for all your great work!
P.S. If you think it makes more sense to explicitly list all forwarded signals as opposed to just the exclusions, I'm happy to edit.