-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[fix](parquet) incorrect skip files when returning eof #57071
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
|
run buildall |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.72 s |
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
hubgeter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
kaka11chen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
### What problem does this PR solve? Problem Summary: Introduced from topn optimization. When opening a parquet reader, all row group may be filtered and the open method will return EOF, we should handle this kind of return value separately and continue opening other files. Otherwise, the rest of files may be wrongly skipped and the result is incorrect.
What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:
Introduced from topn optimization.
When opening a parquet reader, all row group may be filtered and the open method will return EOF,
we should handle this kind of return value separately and continue opening other files.
Otherwise, the rest of files may be wrongly skipped and the result is incorrect.
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)