Fix private gateway acl on static routes#10262
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #10262 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 15.16% 15.15% -0.01%
- Complexity 11314 11318 +4
============================================
Files 5409 5409
Lines 474473 474663 +190
Branches 57876 57903 +27
============================================
+ Hits 71947 71952 +5
- Misses 394482 394666 +184
- Partials 8044 8045 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
iptables rules for ingress look good however, the rules for egress seem wrong I think it should be like note: |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@vishesh92 similar change might be needed |
22462bd to
2fa9d88
Compare
|
@blueorangutan package |
1 similar comment
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12347)
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12392 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12361)
|
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
tested this in a lab env with two VPCs
10.10.0.0/16 and 10.11.0.0/16
private gateways 10.200.20.1 and 10.200.20.2 connected (as each others gateway and tested several acl lists configurations to block/allow tcp/icmp.
The only noteworthy limitation is that running processes won't get blocked. I do not consider that part of this PR/issue and am not sure if that needs solving, as restart with cleanup would take care of that.
Description
This PR fixes #9837
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?