Skip to content

GH-41088: [CI][Crossbow] Fix GitHub Actions workflow syntax error#41091

Merged
kou merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
kou:ci-verify-rc-macos
Apr 9, 2024
Merged

GH-41088: [CI][Crossbow] Fix GitHub Actions workflow syntax error#41091
kou merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
kou:ci-verify-rc-macos

Conversation

@kou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kou kou commented Apr 9, 2024

Rationale for this change

We can't use multiple top-level env: in workflow. GH-40949 introduced a top-level env: by macros.github_header(). It broke workflows that already have top-level env:.

What changes are included in this PR?

Omit top-level env: key and reuse the top-level env: key generated by macros.github_header() in workflows.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

We can't use multiple top-level `env:` in workflow. apacheGH-40949
introduced a top-level `env:` by `macros.github_header()`. It broke
workflows that already have top-level `env:`.
@kou kou requested review from assignUser and raulcd as code owners April 9, 2024 03:07
@kou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

kou commented Apr 9, 2024

@github-actions crossbow submit verify-rc-source-java-macos-amd64 wheel-macos-*

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2024

⚠️ GitHub issue #41088 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Apr 9, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2024

Revision: 7c26fed

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-20245b171a

Task Status
verify-rc-source-java-macos-amd64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp310-arm64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp311-arm64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp312-arm64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp38-arm64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-big-sur-cp39-arm64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-catalina-cp310-amd64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-catalina-cp311-amd64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-catalina-cp312-amd64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-catalina-cp38-amd64 GitHub Actions
wheel-macos-catalina-cp39-amd64 GitHub Actions

@kou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

kou commented Apr 9, 2024

+1

wheel-macos-* failures are unrelated to this. It's tracked by #41100.

@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 2a2f268.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details.

raulcd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
…1091)

### Rationale for this change

We can't use multiple top-level `env:` in workflow. GH-40949 introduced a top-level `env:` by `macros.github_header()`. It broke workflows that already have top-level `env:`.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Omit top-level `env:` key and reuse the top-level `env:` key generated by `macros.github_header()` in workflows.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* GitHub Issue: #41088

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
vibhatha pushed a commit to vibhatha/arrow that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
…or (apache#41091)

### Rationale for this change

We can't use multiple top-level `env:` in workflow. apacheGH-40949 introduced a top-level `env:` by `macros.github_header()`. It broke workflows that already have top-level `env:`.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Omit top-level `env:` key and reuse the top-level `env:` key generated by `macros.github_header()` in workflows.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* GitHub Issue: apache#41088

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant