Fixing some tests and compile problems in reindex module#1
Merged
abeyad merged 1 commit intoabeyad:suggester-wiring-refactoringfrom Mar 11, 2016
Merged
Conversation
abeyad
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2016
Fixing some tests and compile problems in reindex module
abeyad
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2016
Add REST test for:
* `.doc`
* `.docx`
The later fails with:
```
==> Test Info: seed=DB93397128B876D4; jvm=1; suite=1
Suite: org.elasticsearch.ingest.attachment.IngestAttachmentRestIT
2> REPRODUCE WITH: gradle :plugins:ingest-attachment:integTest -Dtests.seed=DB93397128B876D4 -Dtests.class=org.elasticsearch.ingest.attachment.IngestAttachmentRestIT -Dtests.method="test {yaml=ingest_attachment/30_files_supported/Test ingest attachment processor with .docx file}" -Des.logger.level=WARN -Dtests.security.manager=true -Dtests.locale=bg -Dtests.timezone=Europe/Athens
FAILURE 4.53s | IngestAttachmentRestIT.test {yaml=ingest_attachment/30_files_supported/Test ingest attachment processor with .docx file} <<< FAILURES!
> Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2xx] status code but api [index] returned [400 Bad Request] [{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"parse_exception","reason":"Error parsing document in field [field1]"}],"type":"parse_exception","reason":"Error parsing document in field [field1]","caused_by":{"type":"tika_exception","reason":"Unexpected RuntimeException from org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.OOXMLParser@7f85baa5","caused_by":{"type":"illegal_state_exception","reason":"access denied (\"java.lang.RuntimePermission\" \"getClassLoader\")","caused_by":{"type":"access_control_exception","reason":"access denied (\"java.lang.RuntimePermission\" \"getClassLoader\")"}}}},"status":400}]
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([DB93397128B876D4:53C706AB86441B2C]:0)
> at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.section.DoSection.execute(DoSection.java:107)
> at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.ESRestTestCase.test(ESRestTestCase.java:395)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
```
Related to elastic#16864
abeyad
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2016
``` > Throwable #1: java.lang.RuntimeException: file handle leaks: [SeekableByteChannel(/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/elastic+elasticsearch+master+g1gc/core/build/testrun/integTest/J0/temp/org.elasticsearch.search.suggest.CompletionSuggestSearch2xIT_518545A20D129C8C-001/tempDir-001/data/nodes/1/indices/4sTECv6WSJOJsw9L4CGamg/0/index/segments_1), SeekableByteChannel(/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/elastic+elasticsearch+master+g1gc/core/build/testrun/integTest/J0/temp/org.elasticsearch.search.suggest.CompletionSuggestSearch2xIT_518545A20D129C8C-001/tempDir-001/data/nodes/1/indices/4sTECv6WSJOJsw9L4CGamg/0/index/segments_1)] > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([518545A20D129C8C]:0) > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.LeakFS.onClose(LeakFS.java:63) > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.FilterFileSystem.close(FilterFileSystem.java:77) > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.FilterFileSystem.close(FilterFileSystem.java:78) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > Caused by: java.lang.Exception > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.LeakFS.onOpen(LeakFS.java:46) > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.callOpenHook(HandleTrackingFS.java:81) > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.newByteChannel(HandleTrackingFS.java:271) > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.FilterFileSystemProvider.newByteChannel(FilterFileSystemProvider.java:212) > at org.apache.lucene.mockfile.HandleTrackingFS.newByteChannel(HandleTrackingFS.java:240) > at java.nio.file.Files.newByteChannel(Files.java:361) > at java.nio.file.Files.newByteChannel(Files.java:407) > at org.apache.lucene.store.SimpleFSDirectory.openInput(SimpleFSDirectory.java:77) > at org.apache.lucene.store.FilterDirectory.openInput(FilterDirectory.java:94) > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.slowFileExists(LuceneTestCase.java:2695) > at org.apache.lucene.store.MockDirectoryWrapper.openInput(MockDirectoryWrapper.java:737) > at org.apache.lucene.store.FilterDirectory.openInput(FilterDirectory.java:94) > at org.elasticsearch.common.lucene.Lucene$1.doBody(Lucene.java:237) > at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:685) > at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:637) > at org.elasticsearch.common.lucene.Lucene.checkSegmentInfoIntegrity(Lucene.java:242) > at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store$MetadataSnapshot.loadMetadata(Store.java:847) > at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store$MetadataSnapshot.<init>(Store.java:740) > at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store.getMetadata(Store.java:260) > at org.elasticsearch.index.store.Store.getMetadata(Store.java:240) > at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.doCheckIndex(IndexShard.java:1310) > at org.elasticsearch.common.util.CancellableThreads.executeIO(CancellableThreads.java:102) > at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.checkIndex(IndexShard.java:1288) > at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.internalPerformTranslogRecovery(IndexShard.java:921) > at org.elasticsearch.index.shard.IndexShard.skipTranslogRecovery(IndexShard.java:964) > at org.elasticsearch.indices.recovery.RecoveryTarget.prepareForTranslogOperations(RecoveryTarget.java:297) > at ```
abeyad
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2016
Old: ``` > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2xx] status code but api [reindex] returned [400 Bad Request] [{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"parsing_exception","reason":"[reindex] failed to parse field [dest]","line":1,"col":25}],"type":"parsing_exception","reason":"[reindex] failed to parse field [dest]","line":1,"col":25,"caused_by":{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"[dest] unknown field [asdfadf], parser not found"}},"status":400}] > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([9325F8C5C6F227DD:1B71C71F680E4A25]:0) > at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.DoSection.execute(DoSection.java:119) > at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:309) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) ``` New: ``` > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: Failure at [reindex/10_basic:12]: expected [2xx] status code but api [reindex] returned [400 Bad Request] [{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"parsing_exception","reason":"[reindex] failed to parse field [dest]","line":1,"col":25}],"type":"parsing_exception","reason":"[reindex] failed to parse field [dest]","line":1,"col":25,"caused_by":{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"[dest] unknown field [asdfadf], parser not found"}},"status":400}] > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([444DEEAF47322306:CC19D175E9CE4EFE]:0) > at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:329) > at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.test(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:309) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2xx] status code but api [reindex] returned [400 Bad Request] [{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"parsing_exception","reason":"[reindex] failed to parse field [dest]","line":1,"col":25}],"type":"parsing_exception","reason":"[reindex] failed to parse field [dest]","line":1,"col":25,"caused_by":{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"[dest] unknown field [asdfadf], parser not found"}},"status":400}] > at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.section.DoSection.execute(DoSection.java:119) > at org.elasticsearch.test.rest.yaml.ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.executeSection(ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase.java:325) > ... 37 more ``` Sorry for the longer stack trace, but I wanted to be sure I didn't throw anything away by accident.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.