[Review] SyliusReviewBundle#3980
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No need for these (3) migrations! Only 1 is sufficient, which adds/removes review table :D
65e15ce to
dda2112
Compare
|
@GSadee Rebase has gone wrong this one probably... :) |
|
@GSadee @pjedrzejewski can you estimate when this will be finished? Got a project in development where reviews are needed, so wanted to know if I should wait or implement it on my own. |
|
We need this too and we want to get it merged by the end of the week. I would review it today already but rebase went really wrong... |
|
@nakashu it will be done ASAP. We want to merge it this week. |
|
great to hear. thanks |
|
I'll probably add support for schema aggregate rating in PR after you merge this. (if it is not present.) Propabably for another RFC, is how to implement it.
https://schema.org/AggregateRating WIll create an RFC after merge. |
dda2112 to
dad43bf
Compare
features/reviews/reviews.feature
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We shall be consistent and align all new scenarios to left.
Split configurations into Review-, Product- and CoreBundle parts
Also some general and CS fixes.
Also some changes/fixes in templates and crucial changes in review creation.
Also some minor PR review fixes
…tead of ResourceController
94e26b0 to
6a793f9
Compare
| }, | ||
| "extra": { | ||
| "branch-alias": { | ||
| "dev-master": "0.17/-dev" |
6a793f9 to
c9a86d0
Compare
[Review] SyliusReviewBundle
|
Long road but we have made it, thanks Grzegorz, Mateusz, Daniel and everyone involved! 👍 🎆 |
|
That was a big one! Great to see it merged! Thanks everyone 👍 |
|
I'm really glad to see it merged 🎉 |
[Review] SyliusReviewBundle
Initial implementation of SyliusReviewBundle, which allows to easily manage review system. It's based on @Zales0123 #3300.
"Reviewable" and "Reviewer" classes can be configured under
sylius_reviewtag:I have added changes from #3372 and extended this PR to use CustomerGuestType in ReviewType.