Skip to content

Issue 1892 concept from non default vocabulary#1895

Merged
chrisknoll merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
issue-1892-concept_from_non_default_vocabulary
Jun 10, 2021
Merged

Issue 1892 concept from non default vocabulary#1895
chrisknoll merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
issue-1892-concept_from_non_default_vocabulary

Conversation

@ssuvorov-fls
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #1892

@chrisknoll chrisknoll merged commit 6c09816 into master Jun 10, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the issue-1892-concept_from_non_default_vocabulary branch June 10, 2021 15:12
ssuvorov-fls added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2021
* add error handling for missing concept from non default vocabulary(#1892)

Co-authored-by: Sergey Suvorov <sergey.suvorov@odysseusinc.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6c09816)
m0nhawk pushed a commit to uc-cdis/WebAPI that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2021
* add error handling for missing concept from non default vocabulary(OHDSI#1892)

Co-authored-by: Sergey Suvorov <sergey.suvorov@odysseusinc.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Data tables error if we try to save concept set with a concept which is not included in default vocabulary source

2 participants