Conversation
5239666 to
6792f06
Compare
this makes references to types allocated in Julia recursively forward compatible with C structs
rename jl_typetag_t => jl_taggedvalue_t rename jl_typetagof => jl_astaggedvalue
6792f06 to
cbf9da5
Compare
types as C-structs [rebased]
|
Does this deserve a NEWS entry? |
|
Also need to remove the reference to #2818 from the "Calling C and Fortran" docs. |
|
This utterly broke the windows build. Can we please let CI do its job? |
|
True – there's not much point in paying AppVeyor for CI as a service if we're going to ignore it. |
|
@vtjnash or @Keno, how do we deal with this |
|
Ah, I was considering fixing that, but couldn't come up with a test case originally. On my phone now, but if someone wants to take a shot at this -- every pool we allocate in the gc should be shifted by (sizeof(jl_typetag_t)%16 bytes) before slicing it up |
|
AppVeyor's also idle right now so if someone can translate that into a patch it shouldn't take long to check. |
|
@StefanKarpinski is it possible to change some permissions to let more people cancel appveyor builds? I don't think I can. |
|
@JeffBezanson you have to log out then log back in as StefanKarpinski. Everyone with commit access should be allowed to do that. |
|
It's a really odd UI (cc @FeodorFitsner this should probably be made simpler / more obvious) - you log in with your own Github credentials, but then you should see a screen that looks like this: |
|
I don't have that option, I presume because my GitHub account was renamed and AppVeyor got confused. |
|
Sure, this will be changed though it's non-trivial change (API is affected) that requires careful planning. Perhaps, will be a good chance to re-write UI on Angular 2.0 and TypeScript :) |
|
So, aside from the MinGW failure which I was hoping someone could translate from Jameson English into commit-worthy code (I can't...), there's also this: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0scy7z2d.aspx |
i assume you mean that issue comes up when you try to do a msvc compile? you could probably just make this macro define empty: Line 60 in 0d8cec3 it seems that may be a C99 feature |
|
Will try that. Thanks for fixing the alignment issue. |
|
That helps a bit. How about this line Line 86 in efb878e I've also been trying with the VS 2015 rc's that are available on AppVeyor, and it doesn't help fix these. |
|
I don't think the size-zero array is a C99 thing, it looks from https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html like it's a GNU extension and the MSVC error is strictly speaking true according to the C standard. Someone should check whether ICC allows this construct. |
|
If the intent is to have a variable-length array, then you should be able to replace Line 49 in e1f0310 |
|
No, that doesn't work https://ci.appveyor.com/project/tkelman/julia/build/1.0.644 The other struct types with C99 flexible array members aren't causing problems because there don't appear to be any arrays of them anywhere. |
|
Ah, got it, that's the recursive nature of these that's the problem. |

@JeffBezanson and I are in the process of looking at and hopefully merging #2818. This rebases that PR (with some unrelated changes already cherry-picked to master) hopefully to be merged soon.