-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Comparing changes
Open a pull request
base repository: Jelly-RDF/cli
base: v0.5.2
head repository: Jelly-RDF/cli
compare: v0.6.0
- 8 commits
- 16 files changed
- 3 contributors
Commits on Jul 13, 2025
-
README: add note on JIT vs AOT perf (#157)
* README: add note on JIT vs AOT perf True story. Observed on osm2rdf data, when converting ~7M triples from Turtle to Jelly. With JIT it took ~7s, while with AOT it was ~25–30s, depending on how the stars were aligning. Tested on the same machine as listed in Jelly benchmarks on the website. The JIT throughput would be in the ballpark of 1MT/s, which is what we would expect from the Turtle parser (it tops out around this point). The AOT throughput is just abysmal. * fix * fix2
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 632be28 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 632be28View commit details
Commits on Jul 15, 2025
-
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 1fe8b23 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 1fe8b23View commit details
Commits on Jul 16, 2025
-
Add detailed content reporting for rdf inspect (#159)
* Move awkward field iteration inside FrameInfo * Add all details functionality * Add grouping functionality and fix frame aggregation * Add some documentation * Add complex jelly file tests * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Piotr Sowiński <ostrzycielnozyczek@gmail.com> * Remove unused field * Rename 'flat' to 'all' and make its output nested * Add 0's filtering from output * Make nested results ordered --------- Co-authored-by: Piotr Sowiński <ostrzycielnozyczek@gmail.com>
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 1962a43 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 1962a43View commit details -
Simplify type testing with typeable (#161)
Does the same thing, cleaner syntax.
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for f819c31 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA f819c31View commit details -
Initial implementation with context parameters (#162)
Closes #74 Everything came together really nicely with context parameters. One thing is that I'm not sure how accurate the statistics are. I use getSerializedSize() of ProtoMessage as the source (and length of encoded string + 1 for the tag byte), but I'm not sure if these are correct. I was hoping that triples_size would equal subject_size + predicate_size + object_size, but that isn't the case.
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 96e1519 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 96e1519View commit details
Commits on Jul 17, 2025
-
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 3523dfc - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 3523dfcView commit details
Commits on Jul 21, 2025
-
Add 'generalized statements' option inference based on input format (#…
…164) * Initial generalized rdf inference implementation * Add jelly-text test for options * Mark NTriples and NQuads as supporting generalized statements
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 6abd764 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 6abd764View commit details
Commits on Jul 22, 2025
-
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 192842d - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 192842dView commit details
This comparison is taking too long to generate.
Unfortunately it looks like we can’t render this comparison for you right now. It might be too big, or there might be something weird with your repository.
You can try running this command locally to see the comparison on your machine:
git diff v0.5.2...v0.6.0