Mark two grdtrack tests as xfail due to upstream GMT 6.3 fixes#1608
Mark two grdtrack tests as xfail due to upstream GMT 6.3 fixes#1608
Conversation
Using correct output values for `grdtrack` with bicubic interpolation for `xarray.DataArray` grids on GMT 6.3.
|
In this case the result is updated and the test is marked as xfail with a condition of <= GMT 6.X but for others the current result is kept and the test is marked as xfail with a condition of > GMT 6.X, for example: pygmt/pygmt/tests/test_velo.py Lines 74 to 95 in 5dc135b Edit: The steps in this PR are preferable IMO because updating the tests and marking as xfail for <= GMT 6.X makes it easier to test for regressions in the GMT dev branch between releases. |
Agree that using <= GMT6.X is better, I was actually following this 😄: pygmt/pygmt/tests/test_plot.py Lines 307 to 311 in 5dc135b We can remove those xfails on the unit tests for |
Co-authored-by: Meghan Jones <meghanj@alum.mit.edu>
…icMappingTools#1608) Using correct output values for `grdtrack` with bicubic interpolation for `xarray.DataArray` grids on GMT 6.3. Co-authored-by: Meghan Jones <meghanj@alum.mit.edu>
Description of proposed changes
Using correct output values for
grdtrackwith bicubic interpolation onxarray.DataArraygrids on GMT 6.3.Fixes #1309 (comment), Supersedes #1587.
Reminders
make formatandmake checkto make sure the code follows the style guide.doc/api/index.rst.Slash Commands
You can write slash commands (
/command) in the first line of a comment to performspecific operations. Supported slash commands are:
/format: automatically format and lint the code/test-gmt-dev: run full tests on the latest GMT development version