Skip to content

Revert "RTC: Move implementation from jetpack-mu-wpcom to generic package"#47712

Merged
mmtr merged 1 commit intotrunkfrom
revert-47664-dotcom-16392-move-implementation-from-jetpack-mu-wpcom-to-jetpack-the
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

Revert "RTC: Move implementation from jetpack-mu-wpcom to generic package"#47712
mmtr merged 1 commit intotrunkfrom
revert-47664-dotcom-16392-move-implementation-from-jetpack-mu-wpcom-to-jetpack-the

Conversation

@mmtr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mmtr mmtr commented Mar 20, 2026

Reverts #47664

Proposed changes

Looks like I missed something when setting up the new package: p1774000807537989-slack-C01U2KGS2PQ

Related product discussion/links

N/A

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

No

Testing instructions

None

@linear
Copy link
Copy Markdown

linear bot commented Mar 20, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WoA dev site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin (Jetpack or WordPress.com Site Helper), and enable the revert-47664-dotcom-16392-move-implementation-from-jetpack-mu-wpcom-to-jetpack-the branch.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:
bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack revert-47664-dotcom-16392-move-implementation-from-jetpack-mu-wpcom-to-jetpack-the
bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin revert-47664-dotcom-16392-move-implementation-from-jetpack-mu-wpcom-to-jetpack-the

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

@github-actions github-actions bot added [mu wpcom Feature] Gutenberg Rtc [Package] Jetpack mu wpcom WordPress.com Features [Package] Rtc [Plugin] mu wpcom jetpack-mu-wpcom plugin [Plugin] Wpcomsh [Tests] Includes Tests Bug When a feature is broken and / or not performing as intended Docs labels Mar 20, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Make sure to test your changes on all platforms that it applies to. You're responsible for the quality of the code you ship.
  3. You can use GitHub's Reviewers functionality to request a review.
  4. When it's reviewed and merged, you will be pinged in Slack to deploy the changes to WordPress.com simple once the build is done.

If you have questions about anything, reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!


Mu Wpcom plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: WordPress.com Simple releases happen semi-continuously (PCYsg-Jjm-p2)

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.


Wpcomsh plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: Atomic deploys happen twice daily on weekdays (p9o2xV-2EN-p2)

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] Needs Author Reply We need more details from you. This label will be auto-added until the PR meets all requirements. label Mar 20, 2026
@mmtr mmtr added the [Status] Needs Review This PR is ready for review. label Mar 20, 2026
@jp-launch-control
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Coverage Summary

Coverage changed in 1 file.

File Coverage Δ% Δ Uncovered
projects/packages/jetpack-mu-wpcom/src/features/gutenberg-rtc/gutenberg-rtc.php 47/80 (58.75%) 58.75% 27 💔

1 file is newly checked for coverage.

File Coverage
projects/packages/jetpack-mu-wpcom/src/features/gutenberg-rtc/class-wp-rest-gutenberg-rtc.php 0/53 (0.00%) 💔

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

If appropriate, add one of these labels to override the failing coverage check: Covered by non-unit tests Use to ignore the Code coverage requirement check when E2Es or other non-unit tests cover the code Coverage tests to be added later Use to ignore the Code coverage requirement check when tests will be added in a follow-up PR I don't care about code coverage for this PR Use this label to ignore the check for insufficient code coveage.

@mmtr mmtr merged commit 3c364b1 into trunk Mar 20, 2026
94 of 98 checks passed
@mmtr mmtr deleted the revert-47664-dotcom-16392-move-implementation-from-jetpack-mu-wpcom-to-jetpack-the branch March 20, 2026 10:36
@github-actions github-actions bot removed [Status] Needs Author Reply We need more details from you. This label will be auto-added until the PR meets all requirements. [Status] Needs Review This PR is ready for review. labels Mar 20, 2026
vianasw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug When a feature is broken and / or not performing as intended Docs [mu wpcom Feature] Gutenberg Rtc [Package] Jetpack mu wpcom WordPress.com Features [Package] Rtc [Plugin] mu wpcom jetpack-mu-wpcom plugin [Plugin] Wpcomsh [Tests] Includes Tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant