Throwback Thursday: Does 2 Timothy 1:16-18 teach Purgatory?

Welcome to this week’s “Throwback Thursday” installment. Today, we’re going to revisit a post that was originally published back on May 29, 2018 and has been revised.

Catholicism differs in many respects from Biblical Christianity, including its belief in Purgatory. The Catholic church defines Purgatory as “a place or state of suffering inhabited by the souls of sinners who are expiating (i.e., atoning for) their sins before going to Heaven.” Catholicism teaches that even one unconfessed mortal (i.e., major) sin on the soul dooms a person to Hell, while venial (i.e., small, forgivable) sins or any residual temporal punishment remaining after confession must be expiated in Purgatory. However, references to Purgatory can neither be found explicitly or implicitly in Scripture. Catholic apologists, of course, argue that the doctrine is based on Scripture.

The other day I was listening to my daily dose of Catholic talk radio via the “Called to Communion” radio show with host David Anders and a listener called in asking where Purgatory could be found in the Bible. Anders responded by saying the doctrine of Purgatory and praying for the dead can be found in 2 Maccabees 12:38-45. See here.

While the Roman Catholic church accepts 2 Maccabees and the other books of the Apocrypha (1 and 2 Maccabees, Sirach (Ecclesiasticus), Wisdom (Wisdom of Solomon), Baruch, Tobit, Judith, and additions to Daniel and Esther) as Scripture, the Jews of ancient Israel never embraced those writings as Scripture and, likewise, Jesus and the Apostles never quoted from them. Besides, the dead soldiers cited in the passage had been participating in gross idolatry, a “mortal” sin according to Catholic dogma, so they would have been disqualified from Purgatory anyway.

But wait! Anders also claimed the apostle, Paul, refers to Purgatory in 2 Timothy 1:16-18. Let’s take a look at that passage:

16May the Lord grant mercy to the household of Onesiphorus, for he often refreshed me and was not ashamed of my chains, 17but when he arrived in Rome he searched for me earnestly and found me— 18may the Lord grant him to find mercy from the Lord on that day!—and you well know all the service he rendered at Ephesus.”

But is this passage referring to Purgatory? Let’s look at John MacArthur’s exegesis of this passage from “The MacArthur Bible Commentary,” 2005, p. 1805:

1:16 Onesiphorus. One of Paul’s loyal coworkers who had not deserted Paul, but befriended him in prison and was not ashamed or afraid to visit the apostle there regularly and minister to his needs. Since Paul asks Timothy to greet those in his house (4:19), the family obviously lived in or near Ephesus.

1:17 when he arrived in Rome. Onesiphorus was perhaps on a business trip, and the text implies that his search involved time, effort, and possibly even danger.

1:18 that day. This is also called the “Day of Christ,” when believers will stand before the judgement seat and be rewarded (Phil. 1:6Phil. 1:101 Cor. 3:132 Cor. 5:101 Pet. 1:5).

Catholicism errs greatly by confusing the judgement seat of Christ (aka the Bema Seat), where the works of saved believers will be judged, with the Great White Throne Judgement where the unsaved will be judged in their sins and condemned to Hell.

Claiming from 2 Timothy 1:16-18 that Onesiphorus is dead and in Purgatory and that Paul is praying for him is forcing-a-square-peg-through-a-round-hole eisegesis. Onesiphorus was alive at the time Paul wrote 2 Timothy and the apostle was praying that Onesiphorus be ultimately rewarded at the Bema Seat for his service. Paul was also praying for his family back in Ephesus for their sacrifice in his absence.

Over the centuries, Rome, with its works gospel of salvation by sacramentalism and merit, created an elaborate system with regards to Purgatory involving indulgences, the church’s alleged treasury of merit, and prayers for the dead. But believers know that God’s Word mentions only two afterlife destinations for the dead; Heaven and Hell.

“So we are always of good courage. We know that while we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord, for we walk by faith, not by sight. Yes, we are of good courage, and we would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord.” – 2 Cor. 5:6-8

There is no “middle place” for the punishment of small sins. “For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it” – James 2:10. Purgatory is a man-made creation meant as a “safety net” for credulous works religionists. There is only Heaven and Hell. We are all sinners and none of us can merit Heaven. Repent of your rebellion against God and accept Jesus Christ as your Savior through faith alone.

What does the Bible say about Purgatory?
https://www.gotquestions.org/purgatory.html

Roman Catholicism Through the Lens of Scripture, Episode 9: Why was the Reformation necessary?

Welcome to the ninth installment of our ten-week video series in which evangelical evangelist Mike Gendron examines Roman Catholicism through the Lens of Scripture.

In Episode 9 below (32-minutes), Mike discusses why the Reformation was absolutely necessary.

Papa Don’t Pope?

Papa Don’t Pope: Why I’m Not a Roman Catholic (and Why the Future Is Protestant)
By Douglas Wilson
Canon Press, 2015, 200 pp.

Douglas Wilson pastors Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho (pop. 25,000), but his influence extends into the upper echelons of the Trump Administration.1 Wilson is an unabashed and unapologetic postmillennialist and Christian Nationalist2 and has sparked controversy with his statements ameliorating slavery in the antebellum South3 and in support of restricting women’s voting rights.4

I had spotted this book at Amazon several years ago, but ignored it because of the farcical cover illustration. I wasn’t aware of who Douglas Wilson was at the time. I’ve since become more aware of Wilson’s views and a recent Google search brought me back to this short book presenting his take on Roman Catholicism. I’m going to keep this review extremely short because I want to be a good steward of my time.

In “Papa Don’t Pope,” Wilson confronts a few Roman Catholic beliefs and practices (e.g., papal authority, icon worship, praying to Mary and saints) and points out their anti-Biblical nature, however, in the fashion of Norman Geisler, he nonetheless embraces the Roman Catholic church as a Gospel-preaching institution at its core. I googled “Douglas Wilson are Catholics Christians?” and came up with a revealing 8-minute video on YouTube in which Wilson argues for the salvation of Catholic apologist and Gospel-denier, G.K. Chesterton.5 6 This book is barely readable (not an exaggeration) due to Wilson’s affected and tiresome lexical shuttlecock. It all becomes clear knowing he’s a devoted disciple of Chesterton and the so-named prince of paradox’s pretentious wordplay. Many people are educated and intelligent, but are severely lacking in spiritual discernment.

This book is less than disappointing. I’ve already wasted far too much time on it.

  1. Who Is Doug Wilson? Pentagon Defends Pastor Who Led Christian Prayer Service ↩︎
  2. Postmillennialism and Theonomy ↩︎
  3. “Southern Slavery,” Douglas Wilson, Wikipedia article ↩︎
  4. Why Doug Wilson is wrong about women’s rights and the 19th Amendment ↩︎
  5. “Chesterton and Tolkien Saved? – YouTube video, 2019 ↩︎
  6. G.K. Chesterton? He was no friend of the Gospel – WordPress post ↩︎

Mike Gendron at Webster Bible Church 🙌

Above and far below: My photos of Mike Gendron speaking at Webster Bible Church on April 25th.

Evangelist and missionary to Roman Catholics, Mike Gendron, spoke at Webster Bible Church in Webster, New York (fifteen miles northeast of downtown Rochester) on Saturday, April 25th, from 10 AM to 12:30 PM and I was blessed to be in attendance. Mike’s message was “Through the Lens of Scripture: A Biblical Evaluation of the Roman Catholic Church.”

As readers of this blog know, I regularly share resources from Mike, including YouTube videos and his monthly newsletter. I got the opportunity to meet with Mike for a very short time following his presentation. What a blessing! I personally thanked Mike for his faithful outreach to Roman Catholics and for his efforts to educate evangelicals regarding the RCC and its false gospel.

I appreciate Pastor Matt Fletcher and Webster Bible Church for hosting Mike. Few and far between are the evangelical churches these days with the discernment, courage, and faithfulness to step out and host Mike in this era of widespread ecumenical accommodation, compromise, and betrayal of the Gospel.

Mike also preached at Webster Bible Church’s Sunday, April 26, 10:30 AM service. His message was “Contending for the Exclusivity of the Gospel.” I’ll be presenting a video of that service in a few weeks.

.

Below is the link to Mike’s website:

Proclaiming the Gospel
https://www.proclaimingthegospel.org/

Sunday video shorts with Jonathan Carl, #13: Is Catholic Confirmation Necessary for Salvation & the Holy Spirit?

Welcome to our Sunday video-shorts series, featuring Jonathan Carl, pastor of South Fork Baptist Church in Hodgenville, Kentucky.

In this 3:35-minute video-short, Jonathan answers the question, Is Catholic confirmation necessary for salvation and the Holy Spirit?

.

Below is a link to Jonathan’s website, The Catholic Blog.
https://www.catholic.blog/

Answering “The Catholicism Answer Book,” Question #37: Who were Mary’s parents?

Thanks for joining us today as we continue our Friday series examining “The Catholicism Answer Book” (2007), written by Roman Catholic priests, John Trigilio and Kenneth D. Brighenti. In this chapter, Trigilio and Brighenti respond to Question #37: Who were Mary’s parents?

There’s a degree redundancy with this question and some of the material that was already covered in Question #27: Who were Jesus’ parents?1 However, we will plow forward. I have boldened some statements in the priests response that I will engage in my rebuttal.

The priests’ response

The priests begin, “There is not much we know about Mary’s parents since their names do not even appear in Sacred Scripture. Tradition has placed their names as Saint Ann and Saint Joachim. What information we can retrieve is from an apocryphal source. Apocryphal sources are numerous, and they fill in much detail that is not in the four Gospels. However, since they are not part of the Sacred Canon of Scripture, they are considered only legends. Nevertheless, the Proto-evangelium of Saint James which was written in 165 AD states that Mary’s birth was miraculous because her parents were sterile, and that an angel predicted her birth to Mary’s father Joachim after he had fasted for forty days in the desert.”

“Often, statues that depict Saint Ann show her as an elderly woman, which would fit the legend of them being advanced in years. Statues also depict Mary as a little girl with a book open, standing next to her mother. Ann is always pointing to the book to show that she was a teacher to her daughter in religious and secular studies. Joachim is portrayed by himself and is also elderly.”

“What we can glean from the Gospels about Ann and Joachim is from their daughter, Mary. As the old axioms says, ‘The apple does not fall far from the tree.'”

The priests then point to the Scripture narratives of Gabriel’s visitation to Mary (aka the Annunciation) and one of Mary, Joseph (“her chaste husband”), and Jesus’s journeys to the temple in Jerusalem (which particular journey is not specified – Tom) as well as Mary’s effort to help her pregnant cousin Elizabeth as evidence that Mary was “extremely devout” and “family oriented.” The priests state, “Based on all these things, we can say that Saint Ann and Saint Joachim must have been deeply religious and a close-knit family.”

The priests conclude with the following: “In French Canada there is a famous shrine to Saint Ann in Beaupre. The Shrine…attracts thousands of visitors annually. They come on pilgrimages to pray and to be renewed in the Lord. Often, people come with a request or seeking a miracle from Almighty God through the intercession of Saint Ann. Those whose prayers are granted often leave an article, such as crutches or wheelchairs that they no longer need because God has worked through Saint Ann and performed a miracle to cure them from their maladies. On her feast day, July 26, over one hundred thousand people attend the special Mass in honor of Saint Ann. The day usually concludes with a candlelight procession and recitation of the Holy Rosary.”

My response

Below are the priests statements that I had boldened above, with my response underneath in red type.

“However, since they are not part of the Sacred Canon of Scripture, they are considered only legends.”

“…states that Mary’s birth was miraculous because her parents were sterile, and that an angel predicted her birth to Mary’s father Joachim after he had fasted for forty days in the desert.”

“Often, statues that depict Saint Ann show her as an elderly woman, which would fit the legend of them being advanced in years.”

“Ann is always pointing to the book to show that she was a teacher to her daughter in religious and secular studies. Joachim is portrayed by himself and is also elderly.”

“Based on all these things, we can say that Saint Ann and Saint Joachim must have been deeply religious and a close-knit family.”

“In French Canada there is a famous shrine to Saint Ann in Beaupre.” 3

“…through the intercession of Saint Ann.”

“…over one hundred thousand people attend the special Mass in honor of Saint Ann. The day usually concludes with a candlelight procession and recitation of the Holy Rosary.”

  1. Answering “The Catholicism Answer Book,” Question #27: Who were Jesus’ parents? – WordPress post ↩︎
  2. Gospel of James – Wikipedia article ↩︎
  3. The official website of the Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré shrine in Quebec ↩︎
  4. Explaining the Heresy of Catholicism – Grace to You ↩︎

Next week: Question #38: How many children did Mary have?

Throwback Thursday: An Invitation to Examine Roman Catholicism in the Light of Scripture

Welcome to this week’s “Throwback Thursday” installment. Today, we’re going to revisit a post that was originally published back on May 30, 2018 and has been revised.

Test All Things: A Gentle Invitation to Examine Your Catholic Faith in the Light of Scripture
By Joseph Mizzi
PDF Download, 2005, 128 pages

Joseph Mizzi of the island nation of Malta has written this excellent primer on the irreconcilable differences between Roman Catholicism and Biblical Christianity. Mizzi was raised in a devout Catholic family, but was taken aback when his brother trusted in Jesus Christ as his Savior through faith alone and left the family religion. Joseph set about to study the Scriptures himself with the aim of persuading his brother to return to Catholicism, but also ended up accepting Jesus Christ as his Savior through faith alone.

This book avoids heavy theological jargon and appeals to the Catholic layperson in a winsome, loving manner. Scripture passages are plentiful. Chapter headings are as follows:

  1. What Will It Profit A Man?
  2. God’s Word Is Truth
  3. Built Upon Christ
  4. Guilty!
  5. Justified!
  6. Baptism
  7. Forgiveness
  8. Purgatory
  9. The Sacrifice Of Christ
  10. The Eucharist
  11. Jesus, Our Priest
  12. My Soul Magnifies The Lord
  13. One Mediator
  14. Salvation Is Not By Works
  15. Jesus Is The Way

For the free 128 page PDF download of “Test All Things,” see here.

“A friend of mine explained (Catholicism’s salvation system) in a simpler way. “God did his part. Now it’s up to you to do your part too.” I used to believe this, and did my utmost to “do my part” but never did I find rest and peace for my soul. How could I know whether I’ve done enough? If I die, would I go to heaven or would I go to hell? These doubts held me captive in a gloomy prison cell, and I know many Catholic friends who are in the same predicament.” – page 103.

Mizzi maintains the website below, Just for Catholics, which has a large amount of information for Roman Catholics who are searching for the truth about salvation by God’s grace alone, through faith alone, in Jesus Christ alone.

Just for Catholics
http://www.justforcatholics.org/

“For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” – Ephesians 2:8-10

May the Lord bless you in your search for the truth.

Roman Catholicism Through the Lens of Scripture, Episode 8: Contending for the Faith against the Ecumenical Movement

Welcome to the eighth installment of our ten-week video series in which evangelical evangelist Mike Gendron examines Roman Catholicism through the Lens of Scripture.

In Episode 8 below (47-minutes), Mike discusses how to earnestly contend for the faith against the ecumenical movement.

Sunday video shorts with Jonathan Carl, #12: Is Catholic Baptism Necessary for Salvation?

Welcome to our Sunday video-shorts series, featuring Jonathan Carl, pastor of South Fork Baptist Church in Hodgenville, Kentucky.

In this 6:34-minute video-short, Jonathan answers the question, Is Catholic Baptism Necessary for Salvation?

.

Below is a link to Jonathan’s website, The Catholic Blog.
https://www.catholic.blog/

Answering “The Catholicism Answer Book,” Question #36: Could Jesus sin?

Thanks for joining us today as we continue our Friday series examining “The Catholicism Answer Book” (2007), written by Roman Catholic priests, John Trigilio and Kenneth D. Brighenti. In this chapter, Trigilio and Brighenti respond to Question #36: Could Jesus sin?

The priests’ response

The priests’ response is rather lengthy, so I will present only the main points below.

The priests write, “No, Jesus could not sin because He was a divine person [sic]. It is metaphysically impossible for Him to sin because to sin is to oppose the Will [sic] of God. While there is only one God, He is one God in three persons [sic] (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). Each person [sic] of the Trinity is God but there are not three Gods, only one. This means each divine person [sic] shares the same intellect and divine will. What one person [sic] knows, all three know. What one wills, all three will. As the Second Person of the Holy Trinity (God the Son), Jesus is God. Therefore, it is impossible for Him to oppose His own will. Were any of the divine persons [sic] able to oppose the divine will, it would be negating Himself, which is impossible to do. Since God cannot sin (meaning He cannot go against His own will), then none of the three divine persons [sic] can sin, either.”

The priests continue, “While acknowledging that in His divinity or divine nature Jesus could not sin, some may ask whether he [sic] could sin in His humanity and human nature. The council of Chalcedon (451) did define that Jesus had two natures (human and divine), which meant He also had two intellects and two wills. Could his human will oppose the divine will? Wasn’t His human will free? Free, yes, but so is the divine will…Jesus’ human free will, like His human rational intellect, are faculties of His human soul, united to His human body but hypostatically united to his one divine person [sic]. That means his [sic] human will and divine will are always in sync, always united and working harmoniously. This does not mean He was not tempted. The devil tempted Jesus in the desert (Matthew 4:1-11; Mark 1:9-13;1 Luke 4:1-14), but that was an external temptation…Jesus’s inability to sin does not diminish or negate His humanity or human nature or even His human free will.”

My response

As we covered thoroughly in Question #30,2 the Bible declares that Jesus was/is God the Son incarnate. God the Son came into the world and took on human flesh to become the only acceptable, perfect sacrifice for sin. He was/is the Theanthropos, the God-Man,3 having two distinct yet inseparable natures, His divine nature and His human nature.4 5

As the divine Second Person of the Trinity, Jesus Christ was incapable of sinning.6 Scripture makes it quite clear that Jesus was without sin:

2 Corinthians 5:21 – For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

Hebrews 4:15 – For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

1 Peter 1:19 – But with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot.

1 Peter 2:22 – He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth.

1 John 3:5 – You know that he appeared in order to take away sins, and in him there is no sin.

Evangelical ecumenists argue that Catholics and Gospel Christians share many Christological doctrines in common, including the beliefs that Jesus had two natures, the divine and the human, and that He was incapable of sinning. However, the RCC violates correct Biblical Christology on multiple levels by usurping and/or undermining the offices of Jesus Christ as Savior and Mediator in regards to…

  • The Sufficiency of Christ’s Sacrifice (The Mass): The RCC teaches that Christ is offered over and over as a propitiatory sacrifice at its masses, contradicting the Bible teaching that Jesus died “once for all” (Hebrews 7:27; 9:26; 10:10-14). The Protestant view is that Christ’s work was completed on the cross, and the mass insults the adequacy of that sacrifice.
  • The Role of Mary (Mariology): Catholic doctrines regarding Mary, such as her Immaculate Conception, perpetual virginity, and assumption into heaven, deify her and take glory away from Christ. Specifically, titles like “Co-redemptrix” and “Mediatrix” are seen as undermining Jesus as the only mediator between God and man (1 Timothy 2:5).
  • Intercession of Saints and Mary: The Catholic practice of praying to Mary and saints rather than solely to God through Jesus denies Christ’s unique role as the sole mediator and intercessor.
  • The Papacy as Vicar of Christ: Attributing the title “Pontifex Maximus” (chief bridge-builder) or “Vicar of Christ” to the pope is blasphemous, as only Jesus is the bridge between heaven and earth.
  • Works-Based Salvation: The Catholic view of salvation is a “works righteousness” system in which sacraments and good works are required to maintain justification, rather than justification through the imputed perfect righteousness of Jesus Christ by accepting Him as Savior through faith alone.
  • The Eucharist (Transubstantiation): Catholics believe Christ is physically present in the eucharist and that eating the consecrated Jesus wafer bestows graces that enable the recipient to avoid sin and thereby merit salvation. Belief/trusting in Jesus as Savior leads to salvation, not eating Jesus. Transubstantiation violates the Biblical teaching of the bodily presence of Christ in heaven (1 Peter 3:22).

A note on the numerous [sic]s: As we’ve observed in previous questions, the priests have enormous difficulty in consistently capitalizing the pronouns linked to the Persons of the Trinity.

  1. The correct reference is actually Mark 1:12-13 ↩︎
  2. Answering “The Catholicism Answer Book,” Question #30: Did Jesus know who He was and where He came from? – WordPress post ↩︎
  3. Got Questions – How can Jesus be both God and man at the same time? ↩︎
  4. Got Questions – Does Christ have two natures? ↩︎
  5. Got Questions – What is the hypostatic union? ↩︎
  6. Got Questions – Could Jesus have sinned? ↩︎

Next week: Question #37: Who were Mary’s parents?