Obama to Set Higher Bar For Keeping State Secrets- New Policy May Affect Wiretap, Torture Suits. Of course they do this the Alinsky way-when all attention is elsewhere–U.N., Donald Trump’s new best friend Gadifi!
In a stunning move, Holder to be given even more control. At the same time we are arresting terrorists all over the U.S., Obama still doesn’t get it. We are at War– yes, the word he hates so much. They want to kill us! Get it?
Washington Post
The Obama administration will announce a new policy Wednesday making it much more difficult for the government to claim that it is protecting state secrets when it hides details of sensitive national security strategies such as rendition and warrantless eavesdropping, according to two senior Justice Department officials.
The new policy requires agencies, including the intelligence community and the military, to convince the attorney general and a team of Justice Department lawyers that the release of sensitive information would present significant harm to “national defense or foreign relations.” In the past, the claim that state secrets were at risk could be invoked with the approval of one official and by meeting a lower standard of proof that disclosure would be harmful.
That claim was asserted dozens of times during the Bush administration, legal scholars said.
The shift could have a broad effect on many lawsuits, including those filed by alleged victims of torture and electronic surveillance. Authorities have frequently argued that judges should dismiss those cases at the outset to avoid the release of information that could compromise national security.
The heightened standard is designed in part to restore the confidence of Congress, civil liberties advocates and judges, who have criticized both the Bush White House and the Obama administration for excessive secrecy. The new policy will take effect Oct. 1 and has been endorsed by federal intelligence agencies, Justice Department sources said.
“What we’re trying to do is . . . improve public confidence that this privilege is invoked very rarely and only when it’s well supported,” said a senior department official involved in the review, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the policy had not yet been unveiled. “By holding ourselves to this higher standard, we’re in some way sending a message to the courts. We’re not following a ‘just trust us’ approach.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/22/AR2009092204295.html?hpid%3Dtopnews
BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades! 